1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0307-742x(21)00558-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Models of Infectious Arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In animal studies, staphylococci were injected into healthy and pre-damaged joints, and significantly more severe and rapid histologic changes were demonstrated in the pre-damaged joints. As a possible reason for the more rapid joint destruction, it has been suggested that infection by pannus can spread more rapidly to the subchondral bone in arthritic joints [ 66 ]. In our study, there was no statistically significant evidence as to which patients had more or less progression of OA, as measured by Kellgren and Lawrence stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal studies, staphylococci were injected into healthy and pre-damaged joints, and significantly more severe and rapid histologic changes were demonstrated in the pre-damaged joints. As a possible reason for the more rapid joint destruction, it has been suggested that infection by pannus can spread more rapidly to the subchondral bone in arthritic joints [ 66 ]. In our study, there was no statistically significant evidence as to which patients had more or less progression of OA, as measured by Kellgren and Lawrence stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-existing joint damage has been reported as a risk factor for SA, due to neovascularization and increased adhesion factors promoting bacteraemia [ 13 ]. Joint structure abnormality can allow pathogens to escape phagocytosis, and infected joints undergo more rapid histological changes [ 27 ]. However, only RA, rather than ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or OA, was found to be a risk factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%