2017
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal models of spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Abstract: Prior to choosing an animal model, the objectives of the proposed study must precisely be defined. Contusion and compression models better simulate the biomechanics and neuropathology of human injury, whereas transection models are valuable to study anatomic regeneration. Rodents are the most common and probably best-suited species for preliminary SCI studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
169
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
169
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, after spinal cord transection, mammals exhibit continual sublesional paralysis due to the complete lack of descending spinal circuitry (Baldwin, Haddad, Pandorf, Roy, & Edgerton, 2013), which produces extensive soleus atrophy and a gradual slow-tofast fiber transition that is characterized by fewer oxidative fibers and higher proportion of glycolytic fibers (Biering-Sorensen et al, 2009), and severe sublesional bone loss (Lin et al, 2018). However, spinal transection eliminates CNS input to the motor unit and to bone and does not reproduce the injury mechanism that occurs most frequently in persons with SCI, suggesting that pathophysiologic differences exist between the transection model and most humans with SCI (Sharif-Alhoseini et al, 2017). Alternatively, the rodent moderate contusion SCI model mimics the injury mechanism and pathophysiology occurring in persons with incomplete SCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, after spinal cord transection, mammals exhibit continual sublesional paralysis due to the complete lack of descending spinal circuitry (Baldwin, Haddad, Pandorf, Roy, & Edgerton, 2013), which produces extensive soleus atrophy and a gradual slow-tofast fiber transition that is characterized by fewer oxidative fibers and higher proportion of glycolytic fibers (Biering-Sorensen et al, 2009), and severe sublesional bone loss (Lin et al, 2018). However, spinal transection eliminates CNS input to the motor unit and to bone and does not reproduce the injury mechanism that occurs most frequently in persons with SCI, suggesting that pathophysiologic differences exist between the transection model and most humans with SCI (Sharif-Alhoseini et al, 2017). Alternatively, the rodent moderate contusion SCI model mimics the injury mechanism and pathophysiology occurring in persons with incomplete SCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contusion produces a large central lesion that spares few axons in the rat (Anderson et al, 2009). We chose this model because it closely approximates the pathology of SCI in humans (Anderson et al, 2005; Sharif-Alhoseini et al, 2017) and it represents a highly demanding standard that must be achieved in order to move forward with a therapy. To facilitate the actions of the CST on damaged spinal motor circuits after SCI we used cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from the present study illustrate how complicated the pathophysiology of the neurogenic LUT after SCI can be. We employed a well‐characterised animal model for SCI, which is common to the human condition after an accident and also leads to a range of locomotor and micturition impairments related to the contusion intensity . Our present findings show that after either semi‐acute (2 weeks) or semi‐chronic (4 weeks) post‐SCI periods, significant changes to the electrophysiological function of the LUT can be evidenced and evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%