2018
DOI: 10.1163/9789004363779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Rationality

Abstract: Fees are subject to change.This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner. To all animals∵ Contents 10 Elevated Intentions and Common Forms (Pseudo-Peter of Spain) 78 11 Vague Particulars as Universals (Roger Bacon) 82 12 Universal Desire and Experience (John Buridan) 88 13 General Mental Representations (Peter of John Olivi) 95 Part 3xiii Preface from the very first moment was brilliant and this work has profited a lot from their advice and comments. Dominik Perler's colloquium a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This somewhat contrarian approach aspires to a preposterous history, which is pre-posterous in the sense that it "endorses the present as a historical moment in the act of interpretation itself", thereby allowing one to learn from the object under scrutiny, Thirteenth-century theologians maintained varied and nuanced ideas about nonhuman capabilities, however. Though many thinkers did subscribe to the notion that nonhumans are incapable of reason, Oelze (2018) has demonstrated that the mediaeval debate about this topic was nuanced and complex as several thinkers did believe that nonhumans were capable of certain rational processes, such as reasoning, judging, or employing prudence. Likewise, Wei (2020) has recently argued that Parisian theologians enjoyed considerable freedom in exploring the boundary between humans and nonhumans as they saw fit, provided that they acknowledged humankind's unique capacity for reason.…”
Section: The Properties Of Things 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This somewhat contrarian approach aspires to a preposterous history, which is pre-posterous in the sense that it "endorses the present as a historical moment in the act of interpretation itself", thereby allowing one to learn from the object under scrutiny, Thirteenth-century theologians maintained varied and nuanced ideas about nonhuman capabilities, however. Though many thinkers did subscribe to the notion that nonhumans are incapable of reason, Oelze (2018) has demonstrated that the mediaeval debate about this topic was nuanced and complex as several thinkers did believe that nonhumans were capable of certain rational processes, such as reasoning, judging, or employing prudence. Likewise, Wei (2020) has recently argued that Parisian theologians enjoyed considerable freedom in exploring the boundary between humans and nonhumans as they saw fit, provided that they acknowledged humankind's unique capacity for reason.…”
Section: The Properties Of Things 24mentioning
confidence: 99%