2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-010-0543-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal spirits and monetary policy

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is exactly via the dependence of expectations on (past) actual variables that reacting to the output gap can also pay off in terms of inflation volatility. To illustrate this, imagine inflation and output gap staying constant atπ and y and a combination of shocks arriving in one period that would lead (without any 10 Similar results also arise in a different macroeconomic model when employing simplistic behavioral rules of expectation formation (De Grauwe, 2011, 2012a. Such a non-monotonic trade-off between inflation and output gap volatility can also arise in sticky information economies in which the degree of attentiveness or the rate at which agents update their information is endogenized reaction by the central bank) to inflation staying constant and the output gap being above the steady state level.…”
Section: Monetary Policy Inflation and Output Gapmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is exactly via the dependence of expectations on (past) actual variables that reacting to the output gap can also pay off in terms of inflation volatility. To illustrate this, imagine inflation and output gap staying constant atπ and y and a combination of shocks arriving in one period that would lead (without any 10 Similar results also arise in a different macroeconomic model when employing simplistic behavioral rules of expectation formation (De Grauwe, 2011, 2012a. Such a non-monotonic trade-off between inflation and output gap volatility can also arise in sticky information economies in which the degree of attentiveness or the rate at which agents update their information is endogenized reaction by the central bank) to inflation staying constant and the output gap being above the steady state level.…”
Section: Monetary Policy Inflation and Output Gapmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Bullard and Mitra (2002), Marcet and Nicolini (2003), Guesnerie (2009, 2010, Woodford (2010), De Grauwe (2011, 2012a,b), De Grauwe and Kaltwasser (2012, Anufriev et al (2013), Kurz et al (2013), Benhabib et al (2014; see Evans and Honkapohja (2001) and Woodford (2013) for overviews).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find ABM better fitting our research problem in comparison to more traditional techniques (like DSGE models) because we avoid presuming unrealistic cognitive capabilities of our agents (De Grauwe, 2011), given the uncertainty related to constantly changing prices of fossil and REGT electricity but also unforeseeable stochastic events (e.g., emergence of the small scale storage technology). Furthermore, we aim to address income inequality and interaction among heterogeneous agents, which would have been incompatible with the traditional representative agent assumption (Fagiolo and Roventini, 2012, p. 84).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consult Lengnick (2013) for a simple example and Dosi et al (2010) for a very elaborate, policy oriented one. 3 De Grauwe (2010a), De Grauwe (2010c), De Grauwe (2010b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%