2015
DOI: 10.1167/15.12.1159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animate shape features influence high-level animate categorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why might the adult visual system be sensitive to these mid-level cues? One idea is that these mid-level cues bypass basic-level recognition, allowing conceptual properties about an object to be inferred prior to basic-level recognition (i.e., Alaoui-Socé, Long, & Alvarez, 2015). For example, if the visual system can identify something as animate early in processing, the conceptual system can then infer that this object is likely to move on its own and have internal goals.…”
Section: Are These the Same Features Used To Detect Animates In Naturmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Why might the adult visual system be sensitive to these mid-level cues? One idea is that these mid-level cues bypass basic-level recognition, allowing conceptual properties about an object to be inferred prior to basic-level recognition (i.e., Alaoui-Socé, Long, & Alvarez, 2015). For example, if the visual system can identify something as animate early in processing, the conceptual system can then infer that this object is likely to move on its own and have internal goals.…”
Section: Are These the Same Features Used To Detect Animates In Naturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If task-irrelevant novel objects (i.e., greebles) are symmetric and have a typical animate skin color, adults categorize person attributes faster than object attributes (Cheung & Gauthier, 2014). In addition, if irrelevant texforms have animate features, adults categorize animal words faster than object words (Alaoui-Socé et al, 2015). Similarly, mid-level features trigger the processing of familiar, real-world size in the familiar-size Stroop task (Long & Konkle, under review).Thus, information about an object's animacy or real-world size, fed forward from mid-level feature analysis, may constrain the space of basic-level representations considered by the visual system during recognition.…”
Section: Are These the Same Features Used To Detect Animates In Naturmentioning
confidence: 99%