2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anion binding with urea and thiourea derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 386 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We envisaged that these differences might impact upon both the hydrogen bond donor capability and Brønsted acidity of the analogous amides: the deltamides and croconamides (Figure ), and impact their anion binding abilities. While anion recognition by ureas and squaramides (including most of the compounds UR1 – 6 and SQ1 – 6 , Figure ) has been extensively investigated, there is only a single recent report of anion binding by the croconamides and the analogous N , N′ ‐disubstituted deltamides have not previously been reported. In order to compare the binding properties for monovalent anions of ureas, deltamides, squaramides, and croconamides we synthesized a systematic library of symmetrical croconamides CR1–CR6 and deltamides DT1–DT6 , bearing both alkyl and aryl substituents (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We envisaged that these differences might impact upon both the hydrogen bond donor capability and Brønsted acidity of the analogous amides: the deltamides and croconamides (Figure ), and impact their anion binding abilities. While anion recognition by ureas and squaramides (including most of the compounds UR1 – 6 and SQ1 – 6 , Figure ) has been extensively investigated, there is only a single recent report of anion binding by the croconamides and the analogous N , N′ ‐disubstituted deltamides have not previously been reported. In order to compare the binding properties for monovalent anions of ureas, deltamides, squaramides, and croconamides we synthesized a systematic library of symmetrical croconamides CR1–CR6 and deltamides DT1–DT6 , bearing both alkyl and aryl substituents (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature and use of the macrocycles are decided by their shape, synthesis, solubility in organic solvents and aqueous media, their functionalization and their host-guest binding ability [4]. Among the macrocyclic molecules, the selective molecular recognition and self-assembly properties of several classical supramolecular macrocycles, including that of, crown ethers [5], cyclophanes [6], cyclodextrins (CDs) [7,8], cucurbit[n] urils (CB[n]) [9,10], calix[n]arenes [11,12], and Pillar[n] arenes [13] were well documented. Furthermore, most of these macrocycles are neutral molecules and are capable of binding charged guest molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding of these anions to 22 urea‐, carbazole‐ and indolocarbazole‐based receptors (see Scheme ) was measured in [D 6 ]DMSO with 0.5 % of water. Polydentate systems in which several NH centres can form hydrogen bonds with carboxylate centre are among the most suitable building blocks for selecting receptors for carboxylate anions , . For this reason, tetra‐ to hexadentate receptors dominate the selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%