1972
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1972.150100512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anionic polymerization of caprolactam. XLIII. Relationship between osmometric molecular weight, viscosity, and endgroups of a polymer

Abstract: For unfractionated anionic polymers, the following relationship between the osmometric molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity is valid: M̄n = 13200[η]1.115 (cresol), or M̄n = 13000[η]1.021 (93.8% H2SO4). A comparison of the osmometric and viscometric data with the number of endgroups of a polymer confirmed the finding that under certain conditions, moderately branched molecules can be formed; the above parameters depend on the type of the activator used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows viscometric-average molecular weight (M v ) versus yield dependences for e-caprolactam polymerization using N-acetyl-e-caprolactam/ CL 2 Mg/MgCl 2 initiating system at different temperatures. Note, that viscometricaverage molecular weight was determined using relationships derived for the anionic poly(e-caprolactam) and calibrated as a number-average by membrane osmometry [5,36]. Therefore, assuming the similar molecular weight distribution for poly(e-caprolactam)s prepared in this study, we can conclude that M v is close to number-average molecular weight (M n ).…”
Section: Mg/mgcl 2 As Initiatormentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows viscometric-average molecular weight (M v ) versus yield dependences for e-caprolactam polymerization using N-acetyl-e-caprolactam/ CL 2 Mg/MgCl 2 initiating system at different temperatures. Note, that viscometricaverage molecular weight was determined using relationships derived for the anionic poly(e-caprolactam) and calibrated as a number-average by membrane osmometry [5,36]. Therefore, assuming the similar molecular weight distribution for poly(e-caprolactam)s prepared in this study, we can conclude that M v is close to number-average molecular weight (M n ).…”
Section: Mg/mgcl 2 As Initiatormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The intrinsic viscosity of the obtained polymers was measured in m-cresol at 25 ± 0.1°C using an Ubbelohde viscosimeter. The viscometric-average molecular weights (M v ) were calculated using the following equation: [g] = 7.44 9 10 -4 9 M v 0.745 [5,36]. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a TGA51 TA Instruments apparatus between 20 and 550°C under nitrogen with a heating rate 10°C min -1 .…”
Section: Polymer Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of polymerization was determined from viscosity measurements in m-cresol solutions 28) . The percentage of water-extractable monomer and oligomers (WEM) was evaluated as the mass difference between the as-received specimen and the extracted (in boiling water for 30 h) and re-dried specimen.…”
Section: Sample Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of polymerization characterized by the polymerization halftime t 0.5 (time for reaching p = 0.5) was calculated by using the time record of temperature registered in the course of polymerization. The degree of polymerization P was determined from viscosity measurements in m-cresol solutions 24) . Polymer density at 20 8C was assessed by the flotation method using a CCl 4 /toluene system.…”
Section: Sample Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%