1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf02096162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotrope plastische Formänderungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value, according to [3,4,9,43], is likely to be small when compared to U p (plastic part of internal energy) or A p . To calculate anergy, the change in the yield point for austenitic steel 00H19N17Pr with the temperature, see expression (4.4), is required and the authors unfortunately do not have such data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This value, according to [3,4,9,43], is likely to be small when compared to U p (plastic part of internal energy) or A p . To calculate anergy, the change in the yield point for austenitic steel 00H19N17Pr with the temperature, see expression (4.4), is required and the authors unfortunately do not have such data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the description is restricted to such changes in internal structure that are always accompanied by plastic deformation on a macroscopic scale, then the above quantity may also be termed "the reversible heat of plastic deformation," see [3,4,9,43]. The term Ts p is according to [3,4,9,43] likely to be small when compared to U p (plastic part of internal energy) or A p and the assumption s p ∼ = 0 may be regarded as considerably small from the point of view of applied thermoplasticity. In physical terms it means that entropy of elasto-plastic body is comparable to that of purely elastic body [3,4,9,43].…”
Section: Procedures Of Deriving the Thermodynamic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the invariants of the stress tensor should be stationary, too. Applying this "stationary condition" 38 to the above introduced stress rates, Prager argued that the convected (non-corotational) rates presented with the Oldroyd rates (51) and (52) and the Truesdell rate (54) could not be recommended as these rates do not imply stationarity of the stress invariants.…”
Section: Wwwzamm-journalorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the foundation of this classical theory was shaken by an unexpected discovery of spurious phenomena known as shear oscillations. It seems that Lehmann [38] 39 was the first to reveal that a rigid plastic J 2 -flow theory with kinematic hardening would predict an oscillating shear stress response to monotonically progressing simple shearing (refer to Fig. 3).…”
Section: Wwwzamm-journalorgmentioning
confidence: 99%