2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.07099
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic compact stars: Constraining model parameters to account for physical features of tidal Love numbers

Shyam Das,
Saibal Ray,
Maxim Khlopov
et al.

Abstract: In this paper, we develop a new class of models for a compact star with anisotropic stresses inside the matter distribution. By assuming a linear equation of state for the anisotropic matter composition of the star we solve the Einstein field equations. In our approach, for the interior solutions we use a particular form of the ansatz for the metric function g rr . The exterior solution is assumed as Schwarzschild metric and is joined with the interior metric obtained across the boundary of the star. These mat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…∆ = 0 which will be responsible for tidal deformation in the wormhole system and thus may have stability problem. However, this issue of possible calculation of tidal effect via Love numbers can be tackled in a future project 84 .…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∆ = 0 which will be responsible for tidal deformation in the wormhole system and thus may have stability problem. However, this issue of possible calculation of tidal effect via Love numbers can be tackled in a future project 84 .…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us examine whether our solutions satisfy the above necessary physical conditions. In order to proceed we need to give numerical values to the model parameters c 1 , c 2 and k. This will be obtained by using as input values the mass and radius of the pulsar 4U 1608-52, estimated respectively as M = 1.57 +0.3 −0.29 M ⊙ and l = 9.8 ± 1.8 km [105][106][107]. Inserting these values into (3.21)-(3.23), we find where (c 1 ) 1 s−2 has units of km, c 2 is dimensionless and k has units of km 2 .…”
Section: Physical Features Of the Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%