“…The capability of the material to accommodate rather large deviations from stoichiometry and still to crystallise in the chalcopyrite structure finds its explanation in the formation of high concentrations of point defects (vacancies, antisite defects, interstitials) [77,78] and point defect complexes [13], extended structural defects (dislocations, stacking faults, twins) [78,79], orientation domains [80][81][82] separated by small angle grain boundaries [83], and microscopic inclusions of secondary phases in the chalcopyrite matrix [75,81,84]. As an additional complication it must be taken into account that, firstly, there are orientation domains with the CuAu-ordered structure [82] with lattice vibrational characteristics differing from those of the chalcopyrite lattice [85,86] and, secondly, the bond configurations at grain boundaries can considerably differ from the bonding properties in the bulk chalcopyrite matrix [87]. All these defects are expected to give rise to microscopic internal stress fields and corresponding more or less pronounced modifications of the vibrational properties of the compound in general and of the measured average elastic and mechanical properties of crystals in particular [88].…”