2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.144113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic elasticity ofIVBtransition-metal mononitrides determined byab initiocalculations

Abstract: Elastic parameters of IVB transition-metal mononitrides, TiN, ZrN, and HfN in the cubic NaCl crystal structure have been calculated by means of density-functional theory with the generalized gradient approximation. The elastic constants c 11 , c 12 , and c 44 were shown to be sufficiently converged with the density of the k-point mesh in the deformed Brillouin zone to discuss the elastic anisotropy of the systems. It was found that the anisotropy coefficient ϵ͑c 11 − c 12 ͒ /2c 44 increases with the atomic num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculated value for lattice parameter a 0 of TiN is in good agreement with the experimental data calculated by Helmersson et al [18] and it is little higher than theoretical values [5,7] ones. We have obtained the same value for a 0 of ZrN as experimental [20] one, but it is higher than the calculated values [5,7]. Our calculated lattice parameters of Ti 1−x Zr x N (x = 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75) are well with the experimental data calculated by Uglov et al [29].…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our calculated value for lattice parameter a 0 of TiN is in good agreement with the experimental data calculated by Helmersson et al [18] and it is little higher than theoretical values [5,7] ones. We have obtained the same value for a 0 of ZrN as experimental [20] one, but it is higher than the calculated values [5,7]. Our calculated lattice parameters of Ti 1−x Zr x N (x = 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75) are well with the experimental data calculated by Uglov et al [29].…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Elemental ionic pseudopotentials of TiN and ZrN are combined to construct the virtual pseudopotential of Ti 1−x Zr x N: The results for lattice parameter a 0 are reported for different composition rates x in Table I and compared with experiment [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]17] and previous theoretical calculations [5][6][7]. Our calculated value for lattice parameter a 0 of TiN is in good agreement with the experimental data calculated by Helmersson et al [18] and it is little higher than theoretical values [5,7] ones. We have obtained the same value for a 0 of ZrN as experimental [20] one, but it is higher than the calculated values [5,7].…”
Section: Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[29][30][31][32] With few exceptions, our results also compare extremely well to those obtained in similar DFT investigations. 14,27,[33][34][35] The obvious differences between the sets of DFT values shown in Table II are typically expected and they are most probably due to variations in the LDA-GGA, or k point sampling, schemes used in each calculation. With respect to Ti 0.5 Al 0.5 N, we note that for bulk modulus, shear modulus, and the elastic constants, the reported values in the literature are primarily theoretical, 4,27,36,37 closely matching the results reported herein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%