The modification of the EPR response by the superhyperfine interaction is the primary source of information from which metal-ligand bonding characteristics of paramagnetic centers are determined. The plethora of techniques developed to elucidate this quantity have found particular application in the field of biochemistry, and enzymes containing copper(II), iron(III), and manganese(II) centers are regularly probed by pulsed EPR techniques. Owing to the importance of monomeric manganese(III) centers to biocoordination chemistry in metalloenzymes such as superoxide dismutases, [1] and to processes such as catalytic epoxidation [2] and aziridination, [3] the spectroscopic properties of this center have been thoroughly investigated. Nevertheless, there are no reports of superhyperfine interaction in monomeric manganese(III) complexes. Herein, we show that the manganese(III)-fluorine superhyperfine interaction can be observed by using a conventional spectrometer equipped with a parallel-mode X-band cavity. Data from two systems are presented from which principal values of the superhyperfine tensor in the hexafluoromanganate(III) anion are determined. The geometry inferred from the superhyperfine coupling constants does not correlate simply with the MnÀF bond lengths. Apart from this being the first observation of superhyperfine interactions in manganese(III) complexes, this paper provides a textbook example of how the electronic structure of the central ion is reflected in the superhyperfine interaction with the surroundings. [5] At temperatures below 140 K, the high-frequency high-field EPR spectra of salts with 0.05 x 1, as well as temperature-dependent inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectra of the fully deuterated concentrated salt, could be interpreted in terms of the spin Hamiltonian for an S = 2 spin system [Eq. (1)] with g x = g y = 1.993, g z = 1.980, and D = À3.968 cmThe sign of the D parameter and the fact that g z < g x ,g y are both consistent with an axially elongated [6] structure of the anion. Hence, the S = 2 ground state is split, and the M S = AE 2 components are left as the lowest energetic states, separated by approximately 12 cm À1 from the M S = AE 1 components, which in turn are 4 cm = 2 ). Note that the splitting due to the superhyperfine interaction is almost as large as that due to the hyperfine interaction. The spectrum can be satisfactorily reproduced by the effective spin Hamiltonian for a non-Kramers doublet [Eq. (2)] which is valid for the lowest energy M S = AE 2 electronic components. [7] H