1982
DOI: 10.1080/00268978200100611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic intermolecular forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential parameters floated in the present work were different from those in [1] because the information contained in the experimental results is somewhat different for HF complexes. The molecular beam spectra contain information primarily on the anisotropy of the well depth function e(0) and on the radial minimum function Rm(O ) near the linear Rg.…”
Section: Constraints On the Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The potential parameters floated in the present work were different from those in [1] because the information contained in the experimental results is somewhat different for HF complexes. The molecular beam spectra contain information primarily on the anisotropy of the well depth function e(0) and on the radial minimum function Rm(O ) near the linear Rg.…”
Section: Constraints On the Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The parameterization of the intermolecular potential used in this paper is exactly the same as in the preceeding paper, consisting of a Maitland-Smith radial potential whose parameters are allowed to vary as a function of angle (see equations (6), (11) and (13) in [1]). The potential parameters floated in the present work were different from those in [1] because the information contained in the experimental results is somewhat different for HF complexes.…”
Section: Constraints On the Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous MD results obtained with standard site-site potentials built up from atom-atom 6-12 Lennard-Jones potentials did not satisfactorily reproduce the absorption in the P-R interbranch region [10]. We shall make use here of three anisotropic HCl-Ar interaction potentials originally obtained as site-site fits to three realistic energy surfaces, HWK I and HWK II by Holmgren et al [13] and M5 by Hutson et al [14]. We are not especially interested in the quality of the fits, so we consider these site-site anisotropic potentials as prototypical effective surfaces.…”
Section: Hcl-ar Anisotropic Interactions and Rotational Hindrancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is intrinsically better for relatively strongly bound complexes. partially resolved near IR [65] above data semiempirical c 6 , He-Ar potential, above data, except low rsln IR, low T mix near IR [76] inert gas-HCl: MW, RF [82,83] HCl rot pres broad [ 85] above data, mixed 2nd virl coeff [87] MW [89] (enough for complete angular range) [66,67] TT ( 6 , 8 ) ,Ar scat(g) [69] trnsp(g) [70] nucl hypf(b) [71][72][73] o 2 ,Ar scat(b) [74,75] rotationally inelastic scat(g) [ 74] mixed virl coeff(g) [78,79] trnsp, rlx(g) [80,81) HWK [84] HCl pres broad(b) [85] (single min near Ar-HCl configuration) {-} [85,86) M3 [88] HCl pres broad(g) (bottom similar to HWK, more anisotropic wall, featureless around Ar-ClH region) Ne-HCl MW [102][103][104][105][106] (no data sensitive to X-FH region) MW,RF [109,110] near IR [112,113] (not used) total DCS [ 116] '( semiempirical) Ar-HCl MS [89] (constrained 2nd min near Ar-ClH, as predicted by semiempirical and ab initio calc. [90][91][92] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%