“…Therefore it is intrinsically better for relatively strongly bound complexes. partially resolved near IR [65] above data semiempirical c 6 , He-Ar potential, above data, except low rsln IR, low T mix near IR [76] inert gas-HCl: MW, RF [82,83] HCl rot pres broad [ 85] above data, mixed 2nd virl coeff [87] MW [89] (enough for complete angular range) [66,67] TT ( 6 , 8 ) ,Ar scat(g) [69] trnsp(g) [70] nucl hypf(b) [71][72][73] o 2 ,Ar scat(b) [74,75] rotationally inelastic scat(g) [ 74] mixed virl coeff(g) [78,79] trnsp, rlx(g) [80,81) HWK [84] HCl pres broad(b) [85] (single min near Ar-HCl configuration) {-} [85,86) M3 [88] HCl pres broad(g) (bottom similar to HWK, more anisotropic wall, featureless around Ar-ClH region) Ne-HCl MW [102][103][104][105][106] (no data sensitive to X-FH region) MW,RF [109,110] near IR [112,113] (not used) total DCS [ 116] '( semiempirical) Ar-HCl MS [89] (constrained 2nd min near Ar-ClH, as predicted by semiempirical and ab initio calc. [90][91][92] …”