2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-023-11031-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic mechanical behavior and failure characteristics of multi-jointed rock mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…𝐡 𝛽 𝐡 90 = ( 𝛼 90 𝛼 𝛽 ) 0.5 (19) where: 𝜎 𝑐90 is the uniaxial compressive strength when the bedding plane inclination is 𝛽; 𝛼 90 and 𝐡 90 are the values of 𝛼 𝛽 and 𝐡 𝛽 when the bedding plane inclination is 𝛽, By substituting the triaxial test data into equation (17), the anisotropic parameters 𝛼 𝛽 and 𝐡 𝛽 can be calculated. Overall, the Saeidi criterion performs best in terms of fit, while the Hoek-Brown criterion demonstrates high accuracy in most cases.…”
Section: Saeidi Et Al (2014)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…𝐡 𝛽 𝐡 90 = ( 𝛼 90 𝛼 𝛽 ) 0.5 (19) where: 𝜎 𝑐90 is the uniaxial compressive strength when the bedding plane inclination is 𝛽; 𝛼 90 and 𝐡 90 are the values of 𝛼 𝛽 and 𝐡 𝛽 when the bedding plane inclination is 𝛽, By substituting the triaxial test data into equation (17), the anisotropic parameters 𝛼 𝛽 and 𝐡 𝛽 can be calculated. Overall, the Saeidi criterion performs best in terms of fit, while the Hoek-Brown criterion demonstrates high accuracy in most cases.…”
Section: Saeidi Et Al (2014)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al(2022) [16] used DEM to establish a 2D numerical model of shale with varying bedding plane inclinations, examining its mechanical properties under different unloading paths and revealing damage mechanisms during unloading. Cheng et al (2023) [17] used DEM to create a numerical model of jointed rock masses, studying their anisotropic behavior and failure characteristics. They explored the effects of size, confining pressure, and loading rate on strength, energy evolution, and crack distribution within these masses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy difference between the peak point and the post-peak characteristic point is the amplitude of the abrupt energy change. The greater the amplitude of the abrupt post-peak change of U e and U d , the faster the release of energy, and the larger the degree of rock cracking and collapse [ 39 , 40 ]. Under the full-area load of S, the relation curve between amplitude of the abrupt post-peak energy change of rocks and joint angle presents a W-shape distribution.…”
Section: Energy Evolution Law Of Jointed Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%