1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-396x(199901)171:1<289::aid-pssa289>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic Misfit Strain Relaxation in Thin Epitaxial Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a larger density, by a factor of about 30%, of misfit dislocations of the βtype, aligned along the [110] direction, as compared to that of α dislocations, aligned along the [ 110] direction, which was in contradiction to earlier results [3][4][5]. The reason for this is, most probably, the p-type doping of the epitaxial layers, in which the glide velocity of β-type dislocations is higher than that of α-type dislocations [2].…”
Section: Misfit Dislocations and Surface Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed a larger density, by a factor of about 30%, of misfit dislocations of the βtype, aligned along the [110] direction, as compared to that of α dislocations, aligned along the [ 110] direction, which was in contradiction to earlier results [3][4][5]. The reason for this is, most probably, the p-type doping of the epitaxial layers, in which the glide velocity of β-type dislocations is higher than that of α-type dislocations [2].…”
Section: Misfit Dislocations and Surface Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a distinct difference, dependent on dopant impurities, between the glide velocities of the two types of dislocations in several III-V compound semiconductors was revealed [2]. This difference causes an asymmetry in the formation of the two types of misfit dislocations resulting in an initially anisotropic relaxation of epitaxial layers [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear density of misfit dislocations estimated from the TEM, EBIC and AFM results for the both GaAs/InGaAs heterostructures was about 10 4 cm -1 . In the both heterostructures the density of misfit dislocations of the β-type, aligned along the [110] direction, was larger, by a factor of 30-40%, as compared to that of α dislocations, aligned along the ] 10 1 [ direction, which was in contradiction to earlier results [1,7,14]. The reason of it is, most probably, the p-type doping of the epitaxial layers, in which the glide velocity of β-type dislocations is higher than that of α-type dislocations [6].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Variations of RC FWHM, (in our case, increase from 0.8 ° to 2.2 ° for symmetric reflections in the two orthogonal sample position twisted around the surface normal) can occur in heteroepitaxial systems and were associated previously with the misfit dislocation anisotropy in characteristic directions. 22,23 Obviously the signal from a very thin layer always introduces additional broadening of the reflection curves, especially 2θ/θ one and RSM in the radial direction with respect to q [see Fig. 4a and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations of RC FWHM, (in our case, an increase from 0.8 to 2.2°for symmetric reflections in the two orthogonal sample positions twisted around the surface normal) can occur in heteroepitaxial systems and were associated previously with the misfit dislocation anisotropy in characteristic directions. 22,23 Obviously the signal from a very thin layer always introduces additional broadening of the reflection curves, especially the 2θ/θ one and RSM in the radial direction with respect to q (see Figures 4a and 5a,b). In our case, this effect on the FWHM of the 2θ/θ peak (see Figure 4) for the 0012 peak amounts to about 0.7°(006 reflection simulations for an ideal 18.1 nm thick InAs layer grown on GaAs(001); simulation program PANalytical Epitaxy 4.3a) which is about 3 times smaller than FWHM (2.02°) of the experimental TaAs peak.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%