Molecular charge transfer dopants either oxidize or reduce the polymeric backbone through accepting or donating an electron. In such cases, the neutralizing counter-ion to the charge carrier on the polymer is the dopant molecule. [1] Protonating the polymer backbone with a Brønsted acid provides a similar effect with the proton donor acting as the counter-ion. [2,3] Electrochemical methods can be used to supply, or remove, electrons if the polymer is supported by a conductive substrate with infiltration of a counter-ion from an electrolyte. [4] These methods effectively tune the electrical conductivity in polymeric semiconductors for emerging applications including bioelectronics [5] and thermoelectrics. [6] For all doping mechanisms, the interactions that exist between a conjugated polymer, a charge carrier, and its corresponding counter-ion are difficult to ascertain. Our lack of understanding stems from a multitude of complications that arise from doping polymers. The morphology of thin films can evolve upon infiltration of dopants, which convolutes the effects of morphology and carrier concentration on the resulting electrical properties. [7] The use of dopants of varying molecular sizes simultaneously changes steric interactions and the energetics of charge transfer, along with the additional possibility of the formation of charge transfer complexes. [8-10] These confounding factors make simple relationships, like how the degree of interaction between the dopant counter-ion and charge carrier impacts the electronic mobility, challenging to determine. A recent formalism to elucidate the importance of interactions between charge carriers and their associated counterions in semiconducting polymers was developed through examining their spectroscopic signatures in the infrared region. The optical properties of polaronic charge carriers in semiconducting polymers are affected by factors such as electronic/vibrational coupling between chains, coulombic interactions, and disorder. [11,12] One model, developed by Spano and coworkers, rationalizes the optical transitions of polaronic carriers in poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) using a Holstein Hamiltonian modified to incorporate disorder that is present in crystallites of polymers. [13] Both the predicted energies of the optical transitions and their intensities were in good agreement with experimental observations of field-induced charge carriers Since doped polymers require a charge-neutralizing counter-ion to maintain charge neutrality, tailored and high degrees of doping in organic semiconductors requires an understanding of the coupling between ionic and electronic carrier motion. A method of counter-ion exchange is utilized using the polymeric semiconductor poly[2,5-bis(3-tetradecylthiophen-2-yl)thieno[3,2-b] thiophene]-C 14 to deconvolute the effects of ionic/polaronic interactions with the electrical properties of doped semiconducting polymers. In particular, exchanging the counter-ions of the dopant nitrosonium hexafluorophosphate enables investigation into the...