2003
DOI: 10.1190/1.1559037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic traveltime tomography for depth consistent imaging of PP and PS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the parameter σ is a difficult task. In practice, we use the L ‐curve method (see Hansen 1992), also called the continuation method (Bube & Langan 1994): starting from a large regularization weight, we decrease it regularly to retrieve more and more varying models until the data are fitted with the expected accuracy. The solution model is thus the smoothest model that fits the data up to a certain precision.…”
Section: The Seismic Reflection Tomography Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of the parameter σ is a difficult task. In practice, we use the L ‐curve method (see Hansen 1992), also called the continuation method (Bube & Langan 1994): starting from a large regularization weight, we decrease it regularly to retrieve more and more varying models until the data are fitted with the expected accuracy. The solution model is thus the smoothest model that fits the data up to a certain precision.…”
Section: The Seismic Reflection Tomography Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present an application of constrained reflection tomography to one 2-D line of a 3-D 4C OBC (Ocean Bottom Cable) survey with PP and PS data from bp. 1 Broto et al (2003) have already interpreted and studied this data set using an unconstrained inversion method. The velocity model is described by four velocity layers and five interfaces (cf Fig.…”
Section: -D Pp/ps Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the poor conditioning of the estimation of the reference velocity models, the matching of PP‐ and PS‐images is generally insured by pairing a priori PP‐ and PS‐reflected events. In standard traveltime tomography, this seriously complicates the picking step (Gerea, Nicoletis and Rakotoarisoa 2001; Stopin 2001; Broto et al 2003), even if some practical solution can be found (Foss, Ursin and de Hoop 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the velocity macromodel, the estimation of depth consistent P ‐ and S ‐wave velocity models requires the identification of some key reflectors among the PP ‐ and PS ‐arrivals. This pairing is fastidious and can be extremely difficult in regions with a poor signal‐to‐noise ratio (Stopin 2001; Broto et al 2003; Foss et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%