2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3259614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic velocities and offset vector tile prestack-migration processing of the Durham Ranch 3D, Northwest Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, according to the above method, several cross array gathers are extracted from the observation system of the whole work area, and the OVT vector tiles with the same coordinates are extracted, which are arranged according to the corresponding Inline number and Crossline number to form the OVT gather of the whole area, the OVT gather is a single coverage data volume, similar to a conventional migration data volume. The data volume contains 3D spatial coordinates, offset, azimuth and other information, and is a five dimensional data volume (Williams et al 2002;Scott 2009;Zhan 2018).…”
Section: Wide-azimuth Processing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, according to the above method, several cross array gathers are extracted from the observation system of the whole work area, and the OVT vector tiles with the same coordinates are extracted, which are arranged according to the corresponding Inline number and Crossline number to form the OVT gather of the whole area, the OVT gather is a single coverage data volume, similar to a conventional migration data volume. The data volume contains 3D spatial coordinates, offset, azimuth and other information, and is a five dimensional data volume (Williams et al 2002;Scott 2009;Zhan 2018).…”
Section: Wide-azimuth Processing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, azimuthal P-wave gathers will show decreased travel-time in the direction of fractures, faster velocities, and increased travel-time, slower velocities, perpendicular to fractures (Schapper, et al, 2009). The azimuth of fracturing can be determined by looking at the maximum difference between P-fast and P-slow velocities (PP velocity anisotropy).…”
Section: Seismic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…open) and especially if they are filled with fluids. Therefore, under these circumstances, azimuthal gathers will show decreased travel-time in the direction of fractures and increased travel-time perpendicular to fractures (Schapper, et al, 2009). The azimuth of fracturing can thereby be determined and the difference between Vfast and Vslow directions (known as PP velocity anisotropy) is proportional to fracture density (and/or fracture openness).…”
Section: Seismic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The base data set is a 180 sq mi high density, full azimuth, multi-component survey that was designed, acquired and processed using a VectorSeis Nodal acquisition system (Constance, et al, 2015). Processing was carefully performed in order to quantify compressional and converted wave anisotropy (Schapper, et al, 2009;Simmons, 2009). The last step was a reservoir characterization study that integrated rock and fracture properties with a full suite of calibration data from multiple wells, including vertical and lateral FMI logs, mudlogs, Sonic Scanners, chemical tracer in the laterals, completion results and microseismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%