2005
DOI: 10.1163/1568568053320611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropies in peripheral vernier acuity

Abstract: Abstract-Vernier acuity for short horizontal, vertical and oblique target lines was measured in many locations in the periphery of the visual field in normal human observers. In the 10 deg periphery, the average alignment threshold with oblique vernier lines in eight locations for three observers was 2.29 times higher than that with vertical and horizontal target lines. This oblique effect was found everywhere in the visual field. Similar conclusions are drawn for configurations in which the lines were replace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the oblique effect, a radial bias, which describes a biased representation of preferred orientations at particular angular positions, has also been shown in human psychophysics (Rovamo et al 1982; Davey and Zanker 1998; Westheimer 2003, 2005; Sasaki et al . 2006), animal neurophysiology (Leventhal 1983; Leventhal et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition to the oblique effect, a radial bias, which describes a biased representation of preferred orientations at particular angular positions, has also been shown in human psychophysics (Rovamo et al 1982; Davey and Zanker 1998; Westheimer 2003, 2005; Sasaki et al . 2006), animal neurophysiology (Leventhal 1983; Leventhal et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Three factors determine this precision. First, localization of peripheral targets is more precise in the direction than in the R direction (Yap et al, 1987;White et al, 1992;Westheimer, 2005). Second, localization precision in the direction displays a strong "oblique effect": precision is much better along the horizontal and vertical meridians than in oblique directions (White et al, 1992;Westheimer, 2001).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, localization precision in the direction displays a strong "oblique effect": precision is much better along the horizontal and vertical meridians than in oblique directions (White et al, 1992;Westheimer, 2001). Third, localization precision varies across the visual field in the same way as visual acuity does (Yap et al, 1987;Levi and Klein, 1990;Aitsebaomo and Bedell, 1992;White et al, 1992;Westheimer, 2001Westheimer, , 2005. We quantified the first two factors using the values reported by White et al (1992): R / ϭ 6 for targets on the horizontal and vertical meridians, and R / ϭ 2 for targets in other directions.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of our studies also suggest that the anisotropy in vernier acuity might have its origin in the statistics of natural scenes. Evidence in support of these suggestions can be found in 26 , where it was argued that the vernier misalignment can be discussed on the premise that the average orientation of a misaligned pair of abutting lines differs from that of the aligned lines. Vernier acuity preferring horizontal directions over the vertical including the cardinal over the oblique has been demonstrated in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%