2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2014.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy effect on the linear and nonlinear optical properties of a lased dressed donor impurity in a GaAs/GaAlAs nanowire superlattice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the noise strength ζ starts fluctuating with time either periodically or randomly, the ground state electronic population immediately begins to scatter among all the higher states. In conclusion, the time‐development, the time‐average excitation rate (TAER) have been determined following the variation of a few physical quantities such as the magnetic field ( B ), the confinement potential ( ω 0 ), dopant location ( r 0 ), dopant potential strength ( V 0 ), binding energy (BE), the aluminum concentration ( x ) (for Al x Ga 1− x As QD), [ 22 ] geometrical anisotropy, [ 39–42 ] position‐dependent effective mass (PDEM), [ 43–51 ] position‐dependent dielectric screening function (PDDSF), [ 43,45,52,53 ] hydrostatic pressure (HP), [ 54–57 ] temperature ( T ), [ 55–57 ] anharmonicity constant ( k ) and the initial value of the noise strength [ ζ (0)]. In one of our recent works, we have explored TAER but in an entirely different context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the noise strength ζ starts fluctuating with time either periodically or randomly, the ground state electronic population immediately begins to scatter among all the higher states. In conclusion, the time‐development, the time‐average excitation rate (TAER) have been determined following the variation of a few physical quantities such as the magnetic field ( B ), the confinement potential ( ω 0 ), dopant location ( r 0 ), dopant potential strength ( V 0 ), binding energy (BE), the aluminum concentration ( x ) (for Al x Ga 1− x As QD), [ 22 ] geometrical anisotropy, [ 39–42 ] position‐dependent effective mass (PDEM), [ 43–51 ] position‐dependent dielectric screening function (PDDSF), [ 43,45,52,53 ] hydrostatic pressure (HP), [ 54–57 ] temperature ( T ), [ 55–57 ] anharmonicity constant ( k ) and the initial value of the noise strength [ ζ (0)]. In one of our recent works, we have explored TAER but in an entirely different context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The said routes are prominently distinct in view of system‐noise interaction and often lead to different outcomes with respect to the noise‐free environment. The study analyses the OG profiles pursuing the variation of a handful of relevant physical parameters such as electric field ( F ), magnetic field ( B ), confinement potential ( ω 0 ), dopant location ( r 0 ), dopant potential ( V 0 ), binding energy (BE), aluminum concentration ( y ) (considering Al y Ga 1 y As QD), [ 23 ] noise strength ( ζ ), position‐dependent effective mass (PDEM), [ 55–61 ] position‐dependent dielectric screening function (PDDSF), [ 55,62,63 ] geometrical anisotropy, [ 64–67 ] HP, and temperature ( T ). The study divulges the salient features of OG profile of doped QD under the supervision of noise when different physical parameters undergo gradual change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any change of physical parameters that affects the ECP will, therefore, modify the system‐PRF interaction and consequently the TAER. In the present enquiry the physical parameters that are chosen to vary over a range are the amplitude of PRF ( F ), phase of PRF ( φ ), magnetic field ( B ), confinement potential ( ω 0 ), dopant location ( r 0 ), dopant potential ( V 0 ), binding energy (BE), aluminium concentration ( y ) (for doped Al y Ga 1‐y As QD, [23] noise strength ( ζ ), position‐dependent effective mass (PDEM), [41–49] position‐dependent dielectric screening function (PDDSF), [41,43,50,51] geometrical anisotropy, [52–55] hydrostatic pressure (HP) [17,18,26,56,57] and temperature ( T ) [17,18,56,57] . It needs to be mentioned that, in one of our earlier works we have explored excitation in QD subject to PRF but without impurity and noise effects [58] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%