1992
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)91407-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy of interfacial segregation: grain boundaries and free surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps it depends on the interface microstructure, as does solute segregation for grain boundary structures. [71][72][73] Similar results were also obtained for Fe 3 Al type alloys. 16 With sulfur being clearly concentrated at the scale/alloy interface, especially so for MCrAl type alloys, the question that follows is whether this interfacial sulfur will be incorporated into the oxide as the scale grows inward.…”
Section: (2) Sulfursupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps it depends on the interface microstructure, as does solute segregation for grain boundary structures. [71][72][73] Similar results were also obtained for Fe 3 Al type alloys. 16 With sulfur being clearly concentrated at the scale/alloy interface, especially so for MCrAl type alloys, the question that follows is whether this interfacial sulfur will be incorporated into the oxide as the scale grows inward.…”
Section: (2) Sulfursupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The fact that sulfur did not start to segregate to the Al 2 O 3 /FeAl interface until the establishment of a complete layer of α-Al 2 O 3 indicates that the process of impurity segregation to growing oxide/metal interfaces is strongly related to scale development. Perhaps it depends on the interface microstructure, as does solute segregation for grain boundary structures [71][72][73] . Similar results were also obtained for Fe 3 Al type alloys 16 .…”
Section: Sulfurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annealing of the sputtered fracture surface from this boundary, i.e., now a (013) free surface, at the same temperature, however, leads to formation of stable SixNy 2-D surface compounds at this surface thus preventing segregation of other elements. In denitridized and decarburized samples, on the other hand, enrichment of phosphorus and depletion of silicon were found again at the grain boundary whereas pronounced sulfur segregation dominates at the free surface and is accompanied by a weaker phosphorus and silicon segregation [88,89]. Model calculation of the segregation behavior in an Fe-Si (P, S) alloy demonstrated that the differences in the behavior of both crystallographic interfaces are controlled by the free energy of segregation of individual components.…”
Section: Type Of the Interface: Grain Boundary Vs Surface Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). From the phenomenological point of view these qualitative differences may be considered as a generalized anisotropy ofinterfacial segregation [88,89].…”
Section: Type Of the Interface: Grain Boundary Vs Surface Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such multicomponent systems (with three or more components), interactions among different GB adsorbates can significantly affect GB complexion and transition behaviors via attractive or repulsive interactions between them, as well as site competition and induced structural transitions (e.g., disordering). For example, in Fe based alloys, interactions between Si-P [55], Si-C [56], Sn-C [57], and B-P [58] are repulsive, whereas the interactions between B-N [56], Fe-Sb [59], and Ti-P [60] are attractive. Investigating the effects of such interactions is not only scientifically interesting but also technically important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%