1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00032-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
325
7
19

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(380 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
29
325
7
19
Order By: Relevance
“…A transfer of postural control synergy for the thigh has been reported as more beneficial to optimise postural stability [35]. The results obtained as to CoP parameters support this finding as they demonstrate higher performance and efficiency of compensatory responses after prolonged WUS.…”
Section: Influence On Muscle Activity At the Individual Muscle Levelsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A transfer of postural control synergy for the thigh has been reported as more beneficial to optimise postural stability [35]. The results obtained as to CoP parameters support this finding as they demonstrate higher performance and efficiency of compensatory responses after prolonged WUS.…”
Section: Influence On Muscle Activity At the Individual Muscle Levelsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Alexandrov et al (2001) showed that, during the same translation of the center of mass (COM; 1 cm in 500 ms), the A-eigenmovement was associated with an almost four times larger COP excursion than the H-eigenmovement (6.5 cm as compared to 1.7 cm). On the other hand, due to the difference in the inertial properties of the body segments (see Alexandrov et al, 2001), the A-eigenmovement is more efficient for slow motions, while the H-eigenmovement is more efficient for fast COM motions (see also Horak and Nashner, 1986;Runge et al, 1999).…”
Section: Composition Of Muscle Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ankle strategy assumes that the body's COM is repositioned by moving the whole body as a single-segment, inverted pendulum, about the ankle joints, either by controlling ankle muscle stiffness or by increasing ankle muscle activity and changing the "muscle-spring" offset position (Nashner and McCollum 1985;Horak et al 1990;Winter et al 1996Winter et al , 1998Morasso and Sanguinetti 2002). The hip strategy involves antiphasic motion about both the ankle and hip joints (Nashner and McCollum 1985;Horak et al 1990;Winter et al 1996Winter et al , 1998Runge et al 1999). Extensions of these strategies include a mixed hip-ankle strategy (Kuo and Zajak 1993;Kuo 1995).…”
Section: Arm Movements and Trunk Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%