1987
DOI: 10.1080/00140138708966004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ankle angle effects on endurance time, median frequency and mean power of gastrocnemius EMG power spectrum: a comparison between individual and group analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although all these parameters are somewhat correlated, their influence on the characteristics of SEMG signal is difficult to quantify, especially as far as individual characterisation is concerned. Conse-quently, individual SEMG results in this study show a definite disparity, as already observed in other studies [7,18,24].…”
Section: Experimental Limitationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although all these parameters are somewhat correlated, their influence on the characteristics of SEMG signal is difficult to quantify, especially as far as individual characterisation is concerned. Conse-quently, individual SEMG results in this study show a definite disparity, as already observed in other studies [7,18,24].…”
Section: Experimental Limitationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The active and/or passive stretching of the gastrocnemius muscle is the main factor to control the ankle dorsi flexion [ 62 ], which, in turn, is suggested to be the determining factor for the optimization of the vertical squat jump performance [ 56 ]. The present findings can be interpreted under the perspective that the alteration of the angular position of the examined joints result in changes in the length of the gastrocnemius muscle and eventually to the function of its musculotendinous unit [ 47 , 50 , 63 , 64 ] and the neuromechanical function of the ankle joint flexors and extensors [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ]. It is suggested that these modifications due to the different ankle angle cause alterations in the force application capabilities of the shank muscles, as well as in the transfer of the power [ 62 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1984, Rohmert et al . 1986, Sjogaard 1986) than the exponential model (Manenica 1986, Matthijsse et al . 1987, Rose et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%