BackgroundPost-traumatic ankle arthritis is increasing, especially in young people and currently there is still lack of solid guidelines regarding its operative treatment. Ankle distraction arthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy are both options for such medical condition, but the studies comparing their clinical outcomes have been scarce. This study aimed to address this issue.MethodsThis was designed a retrospective study, enrolling 73 consecutive patients who underwent ankle distraction arthroplasty (n=32) or supramalleolar osteotomy (n=41) for post-traumatic ankle arthritis from January 2015 to December 2018. All patients had at least 24-month follow-ups. The outcome measures were the comparisons of the pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain relief, the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, complications, patient-rated overall satisfaction and ankle function.ResultsAt an average of 32 months (range, 24 to 48 months) follow-up, both groups achieved significantly improved VAS and AOFAS scores compared to those at baseline (all p<0.05), but not significantly differed between groups (all p>0.05). The ankle distraction arthroplasty group had better postoperative ankle mobility than the supramalleolar osteotomy group, in terms of plantarflexion (37.8±4.2 vs 30.4±3.6, P=0.022), dorsiflexion (36.5±6.4 vs 28.3±5.5, P=0.011), varus (32.1±4.5 vs 27.1±3.1, P=0.029) and valgus (28.4±3.7 vs 25.2±2.8, P=0.047). Either, both groups did not differ in in the tibial anterior surface angle, talar tilt angle, tibial lateral surface angle, except for the correcting the load-bearing line of the ankle and hindfoot. The prevalence of postoperative complication was not significantly different between both groups (28.1% vs 17.1%, P=0.257). ConclusionsBoth ankle distraction arthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy are effective treatment options for Takakura-Tanaka stage 3 post-traumatic ankle arthritis, but with respective advantages and disadvantages. In practice, individualized treatment option tailored to the medical conditions and patients' specific need should be considered before a decision is made.