2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANN-based modeling and reducing dual-fuel engine’s challenging emissions by multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was formulated by Deb et al [29] as a fast and very efficient multiple-objective evolutionary algorithm, which incorporates the features of elitist archive and a rule for adaptation assignment that takes into account both the rank and the distance of each solution regarding others [30,31]. The algorithm consists of five operators: initialization, fast non-dominated sorting, crossover, mutation, and the elitist crowded comparison operator.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was formulated by Deb et al [29] as a fast and very efficient multiple-objective evolutionary algorithm, which incorporates the features of elitist archive and a rule for adaptation assignment that takes into account both the rank and the distance of each solution regarding others [30,31]. The algorithm consists of five operators: initialization, fast non-dominated sorting, crossover, mutation, and the elitist crowded comparison operator.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an intelligent technique, particle swarm optimization has been adopted by Olivera et al [7] to reduce vehicle emissions and fuel consumption in the city. In 2016, Lotfan et al [8] combined ANN and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II to model and reduce CO and NOx emissions from a direct injection dual-fuel engine. ANN has been utilized by Perrotta et al [9] in 2017 to model fuel consumption of trucks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization result will be more satisfactory because the exploration is not subjected to a limited number of simulating data and computing resources. General surrogate models contain Response Surface Methodology (RSM) [26,27], Radial Basis Function (RBF) [28][29][30][31][32], and Kriging [33][34][35]. However, owing to the diverse functional characteristics of the popular models, it is important to choose the most appropriate models for the responses of hydraulic objectives to diffusion segment parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%