2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annealing effect on structural phase transition of as-synthesized Mg0.1Sr0.1Mn0.8Fe2O4 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, F is average force cons concluded via [12]; F = (F 1 + F 2 ) / 2 and ζ is Poisson's ratio [ ζ = 0.324(1 -1.043P) ], P is the porosity [24,25]. Estimations of ζ lie in between 0.2 -0.26 (Table 3), which lie in between -1 to 0.5 in perfect matching with the isotropic elasticity theory [24,25].…”
Section: Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, F is average force cons concluded via [12]; F = (F 1 + F 2 ) / 2 and ζ is Poisson's ratio [ ζ = 0.324(1 -1.043P) ], P is the porosity [24,25]. Estimations of ζ lie in between 0.2 -0.26 (Table 3), which lie in between -1 to 0.5 in perfect matching with the isotropic elasticity theory [24,25].…”
Section: Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…2 [12,13]. X-ray density was well concluded utilizing the formula [13]:…”
Section: X-ray Diffracting Plots (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A very small portion of the sample would not have interacted with electromagnetic radiation. The average crystallite size ( D ) of powder samples is evaluated using Debye–Scherrer formula and it is gradually increasing with zinc substitution. This kind of behavior is achieved due to decrease in elastic strain (ε) with increase in x (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%