1992
DOI: 10.2307/2992569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annelida and Arthropoda are Not Sister Taxa: A Phylogenetic Analysis of Spiralian Metazoan Morphology

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Oxford University Press and Society of Systematic Biologists are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Systematic Biology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
105
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether brachiopods (together with ectoprocts, phoronids and pterobranchs) belong amongst protostomes or deuterostomes (or neither group) has long been a matter of debate, arising because they variously display mixtures of the supposedly diagnostic characters. Whereas many recent morphology-based reviews have favoured deuterostome a¤nities of these lophophorates (Brusca & Brusca 1990;Schram 1991;Eernisse et al 1992;Nielsen et al 1996), current molecular data unequivocally associate pterobranchs with other deuterostomes but place brachiopods, ectoprocts and phoronids with other protostomes (Field et al 1988;Patterson 1989;Lake 1990;Halanych et al 1995;Conway Morris et al 1996;Cohen et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussion (A) Terebratuloid Brachiopod Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whether brachiopods (together with ectoprocts, phoronids and pterobranchs) belong amongst protostomes or deuterostomes (or neither group) has long been a matter of debate, arising because they variously display mixtures of the supposedly diagnostic characters. Whereas many recent morphology-based reviews have favoured deuterostome a¤nities of these lophophorates (Brusca & Brusca 1990;Schram 1991;Eernisse et al 1992;Nielsen et al 1996), current molecular data unequivocally associate pterobranchs with other deuterostomes but place brachiopods, ectoprocts and phoronids with other protostomes (Field et al 1988;Patterson 1989;Lake 1990;Halanych et al 1995;Conway Morris et al 1996;Cohen et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussion (A) Terebratuloid Brachiopod Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Couso, 2009;Chipman, 2010). Even within the protostomes, arthropods and annelids belong to distinct clades (Eernisse et al, 1992), each containing several unsegmented phyla RNAi phenotypes show high levels of apoptosis both in midline neuroectoderm tissue with pycnotic nuclei (arrowhead) and in midline neuroectoderm tissue that still appears superficially wild-type (asterisks). (D,DЈ) Even apparently mild phenotypes show high levels of midline apoptosis compared with controls (AЈ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other organisms placed in the Ecdysozoa include kinorhynchs, priapulids, nematomorphs, onychophorans and tardigrades (Aguinaldo et ai., 1997). Because chaetognaths appear to be allied to nematodes , they are also presumably Eernisse et al, 1992;Aguinaldo et al, 1997;Eernisse, 1997;; see text for additional references), this topology represents a consensus ilustrating the relationships between major metazoan taxa. Many lesser-known "phyla" (e.g., gastrotrichs, acanthocephalans, placozoans, nematomorphs, etc,) were not included for simplicity or because their phylogenetic affinities are not clear.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Hypotheses In Many Modernmentioning
confidence: 96%