2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11059-012-0152-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annexing the unread: a close reading of “distant reading”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we consider the meticulousness of close reading (Smith, 2016), or the broad sweep of distant reading (Khadem, 2012;Moretti, 2005), this corpus-analytical approach can probably best be described as 'proximal' by comparison. The methodology used to carry out this analysis revealed stories, editorials and factual articles that would not be easily found by hand searching alone, and the time taken to locate them from a collection of over four thousand volumes would have been prohibitive without the use of digital text-searching and data-mining techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider the meticulousness of close reading (Smith, 2016), or the broad sweep of distant reading (Khadem, 2012;Moretti, 2005), this corpus-analytical approach can probably best be described as 'proximal' by comparison. The methodology used to carry out this analysis revealed stories, editorials and factual articles that would not be easily found by hand searching alone, and the time taken to locate them from a collection of over four thousand volumes would have been prohibitive without the use of digital text-searching and data-mining techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relying on a single reader would be unfeasible for exploring an enlarged literary corpus such as LITESCAPE.PT, and might cause one either to overlook influential, contemporary works or even to ignore 'forgotten titles'. 46 Furthermore, collaborative work helps one deal with large amounts of information and to overcome a lack of time and funding. 47 From this perspective, participatory and collaborative research cane be seen to have far more benefits than drawbacks for the digital humanities, since it allows scholars to engage with more information and promotes interdisciplinary research.…”
Section: Daniel Alves and Ana Isabel Queirozmentioning
confidence: 99%