2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-47909-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotated Corpora and Annotation Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other older corpora imposed semantic restrictions: for instance, in the ACE corpora, only entities of semantic types of interest are considered. But even some of the "new generation" corpora still restrict mentions depending on their referentiality/anaphoricity properties: for instance, in ONTONOTES neither expletives nor singletons are annotated (for a discussion of the state of the art in anaphoric annotation, see Poesio et al 2016).…”
Section: Markables In Arraumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other older corpora imposed semantic restrictions: for instance, in the ACE corpora, only entities of semantic types of interest are considered. But even some of the "new generation" corpora still restrict mentions depending on their referentiality/anaphoricity properties: for instance, in ONTONOTES neither expletives nor singletons are annotated (for a discussion of the state of the art in anaphoric annotation, see Poesio et al 2016).…”
Section: Markables In Arraumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bridging anaphora. Annotating-indeed, identifying-bridging anaphora in a reliable way is a difficult task (Poesio and Vieira 1998;Vieira 1998), which is one of the reasons why so few largescale corpora for anaphora include this type of annotation (apart from our own work, we are only aware of few attempts to do so; see Section 4.4 for a discussion of this work and (Poesio et al 2016) for additional discussion of larger corpora some of which also include anaphora). The ARRAU guidelines for bridging anaphora are based on a series of experiments that started with the work of Vieira (1998) and Poesio and Vieira (1998) and continued in the GNOME project (Poesio 2004b).…”
Section: Range Of Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Markable definition Many, especially among the older, anaphorically annotated corpora impose syntactic, semantic or discourse-based restrictions on markables. For instance, in ONTONOTES neither expletives nor singletons are annotated (for a discussion of the state of the art in anaphoric annotation, see (Poesio et al, 2016)). By contrast, in ARRAU all NPs are considered as markables, also when they are non-referring because either expletives such as it or predicative NPs such as a busy place in (1), or when they do not corefer with any other markable and thus form a singleton coreference chain.…”
Section: Markablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(These days, the term bridging reference is mostly used to refer to the associative cases.) Annotating-indeed, even identifying-bridging references in a reliable way is difficult (Vieira, 1998;, which is one of the reasons why so few large-scale corpora for anaphora include this type of annotation (Poesio et al, 2016). The ARRAU guidelines for bridging anaphora are based on experiments that started with the work of Vieira and Poesio (Vieira, 1998; and continued in the GNOME project (Poesio, 2004a).…”
Section: Types Of Anaphoric Relations Markedmentioning
confidence: 99%