Proceedings of the 9th Linguistic Annotation Workshop 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/w15-1609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotating Geographical Entities on Microblog Text

Abstract: This paper presents a discussion of the problems surrounding the task of annotating geographical entities on microblogs and reports the preliminary results of our efforts to annotate Japanese microblog texts. Unlike prior work, we not only annotate geographical location entities but also facility entities, such as stations, restaurants, shopping stores, hospitals and schools. We discuss ways in which to build a gazetteer, the types of ambiguities that need to be considered, reasons why the annotator tends to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is significant work in the area of toponym detection (Matsuda et al, 2015;D. Lieberman et al, 2010) and the closely related fields of named entity recognition (NER) (Li et al, 2018) and entity mention detection (EMD) (Shen et al, 2015) with many different approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant work in the area of toponym detection (Matsuda et al, 2015;D. Lieberman et al, 2010) and the closely related fields of named entity recognition (NER) (Li et al, 2018) and entity mention detection (EMD) (Shen et al, 2015) with many different approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant work in the area of toponym detection (Matsuda et al, 2015;Lieberman et al, 2010) and the closely related fields of named entity recognition and entity mention detection (Shen et al, 2015) with many different approaches. State-of-the-art named entity detection models have historically employed a combination of hand-crafted features, rules, natural language processing, string-pattern matching, and domain knowledge using supervised learning on relatively-small manually annotated corpora (Piskorski and Yangarber, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant work in the area of toponym detection (Matsuda et al, 2015;Lieberman et al, 2010) and the closely related fields of named entity recognition (Li et al, 2018) and entity mention detection (Shen et al, 2015) with many different approaches. State-of-the-art named entity detection models have historically employed a combination of hand-crafted features, rules, natural language processing, string-pattern matching, and domain knowledge using supervised learning on relatively-small manually annotated corpora (Piskorski and Yangarber, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%