2009
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotation and merging of SBML models with semanticSBML

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a number of models of intracellular calcium metabolism were discovered. It would be worthwhile developing one of these models further to include Vitamin D metabolism, especially as Vitamin D is essential for calcium absorption [92], with its physiological optimum defined by the amount required to maintain calcium levels and prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism [93]. Therefore, a computer model could help to investigate the long-term impact of vitamin D deficiency on calcium metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of models of intracellular calcium metabolism were discovered. It would be worthwhile developing one of these models further to include Vitamin D metabolism, especially as Vitamin D is essential for calcium absorption [92], with its physiological optimum defined by the amount required to maintain calcium levels and prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism [93]. Therefore, a computer model could help to investigate the long-term impact of vitamin D deficiency on calcium metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SemanticSBML [17] provides the state of the art tools to obtain a monolithic merged model starting from different IFMBE Proceedings Vol. 31 molecular pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the software tools surveyed, currently only Tools-4-Metatool (Xavier et al, 2011), Compare Subsystems (Oberhardt et al, 2011), SemanticSBML (Krause et al, 2010), COBRA (Becker et al, 2007), The FAME (Boele et al, 2012), MetRxn (Kumar et al, 2012), BudHat (Waltemath et al, 2013), PINT (Wang et al, 2010) and MEMOSys (Pabinger et al, 2011) provide functionality that is related to the comparison of models. Software tools mostly rely on internal or external identifiers, like KEGG ID and ChEBI ID and do not tolerate even small differences in metabolite names like brackets, quotes, apostrophes, spaces, upper/lower case letters and some more symbols which may be caused by the modelers style of defining metabolites.…”
Section: Current Approach Of Metabolic Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%