2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AnnotSV: an integrated tool for structural variations annotation

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
272
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
272
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis was focused on compound heterozygous and homozygous variants (SNV/indel/SV) consistent with a recessive mode of transmission. Structural variants were predicted using by default the CANOES program (Backenroth et al., ) and annotated thanks to our in house script AnnotSV (Geoffroy et al., ) based on the classical annotations such as the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) (MacDonald, Ziman, Yuen, Feuk, & Scherer, ). The IFT140 nomenclature is based on the accession number NM_014714.3 from the RefSeq database (O'Leary et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis was focused on compound heterozygous and homozygous variants (SNV/indel/SV) consistent with a recessive mode of transmission. Structural variants were predicted using by default the CANOES program (Backenroth et al., ) and annotated thanks to our in house script AnnotSV (Geoffroy et al., ) based on the classical annotations such as the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) (MacDonald, Ziman, Yuen, Feuk, & Scherer, ). The IFT140 nomenclature is based on the accession number NM_014714.3 from the RefSeq database (O'Leary et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very stringent filtering criteria were applied to filter out nonpathogenic variants (Table S1): (a) Variants represented with an allele frequency >1% in public variation databases including the 1000Genomes (Auton et al, ), the genome aggregation database (gnomAD; Lek et al, ), the database of genomic variants (MacDonald, Ziman, Yuen, Feuk, & Scherer, ), or our internal exome database, and (b) variants in 5′ and 3′ untranslated region, downstream, upstream, intronic, and synonymous locations without pathogenic prediction of local splice effect. Structural variants (SVs) were predicted using CANOES (Backenroth et al, ) and annotated by AnnotSV 2.0 (Geoffroy, Herenger et al, ). Our analysis considered all inheritance modes but given that two families were consanguineous, we focused on compound heterozygous and homozygous variants consistent with a recessive transmission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer deletions of length >= 100bp were identified using SvABA, and the resulting VCF was annotated using svaba-annotate.R and AnnotSV version 1.2. 20 Long deletions identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were checked for validity and impact to the reading frame via manual inspection of the raw reads (*.alignments.txt.gz) aligned to contigs assembled by SvABA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%