1975
DOI: 10.2307/2230631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual Expenditure on Special Regional Assistance to Industry in Great Britain 1960/1-1972/3: A Note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most interesting result is that while capital intensity had little effect for the period 1960-71 as a whole the variable was significant (at the 95 per cent level) in the earlier sub-period 1960-66 when regional incentives were mainly capital-based, but insignificantly negative in 1966-71 when about 40 per cent of the much increased level of expenditure was for the labour-based subsidy of REP (Begg et al ., 1975) . Much of the controversy over the impact of REP (MacKay, 1976 ;Moore and Rhodes, 1976b ;Ashcroft and Taylor, 1979) is due to the difficulty of disentangling its effects from those of the SDA nonlabour incentives introduced at the same time.…”
Section: (B) Development Area Share Of Total Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most interesting result is that while capital intensity had little effect for the period 1960-71 as a whole the variable was significant (at the 95 per cent level) in the earlier sub-period 1960-66 when regional incentives were mainly capital-based, but insignificantly negative in 1966-71 when about 40 per cent of the much increased level of expenditure was for the labour-based subsidy of REP (Begg et al ., 1975) . Much of the controversy over the impact of REP (MacKay, 1976 ;Moore and Rhodes, 1976b ;Ashcroft and Taylor, 1979) is due to the difficulty of disentangling its effects from those of the SDA nonlabour incentives introduced at the same time.…”
Section: (B) Development Area Share Of Total Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denton, 1976;Mottershead, 1978;McCallum, 1979;Grant, 1982;Sawyer, 1991), but to date there exists no single record of the totality of UK expenditure on industrial assistance over a long period. Where figures for spending have been compiled, these usually relate to some component of policy or to some sub-period (for example, Begg et al, 1973, in the case of regional policy). The purpose of this research note is to present annual figures for gross expenditure on UK central government assistance payments to industry, as part of on-going research into the determinants and effects of UK industrial assistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study represents an advance on previous work, where figures for spending on industrial subsidies are usually given in gross payment terms and relate to a particular period and set of measures (e.g. Begg et al, 1975). Further, although outside the paper's scope, the construction of these series permit an examination of the investment, employment and other effects of these different components of subsidy over the post-war period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%