2017
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in 2015 from Monsanto Europe S.A.

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) assessed the annual post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report for the 2015 growing season of the Cry1Ab-expressing maize event MON 810 provided by Monsanto Europe S.A. The GMO Panel concludes that the insect resistance monitoring data submitted to EFSA do not indicate a decrease in susceptibility of field Iberian populations of corn borers to the Cry1Ab protei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected concentration corresponds to the 99% moulting inhibition concentration (MIC 99 ) estimated with data pooled from ECB populations collected in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Spain between 2005 and 2012 . This diagnostic concentration was validated by testing several ECB populations collected in Spain in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (EFSA GMO Panel, , , ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The selected concentration corresponds to the 99% moulting inhibition concentration (MIC 99 ) estimated with data pooled from ECB populations collected in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Spain between 2005 and 2012 . This diagnostic concentration was validated by testing several ECB populations collected in Spain in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (EFSA GMO Panel, , , ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSA notes that the study with MCB did not include a negative control, as recommended by the GMO Panel (EFSA GMO Panel, ). The inclusion of a suitable negative control is a key element in the design of laboratory studies and adds certainty to the suitability of the test system and increases the reliability of the obtained results (Romeis et al., ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yann Devos, scientific officer of the GMO Unit, presented the explanatory note to the guidance on literature searching (EFSA, 2017 Specific recommendations for: (1) identifying review questions and clarifying their purpose; (2) searching for/identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) extracting high level data from the relevant studies, where appropriate; and (5) summarising and reporting the data, and considering the implications of the findings, were presented.…”
Section: Explanatory Note On Literature Searching Conducted In the Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernando Álvarez, scientific officer of the GMO Unit, presented the EFSA GMO Panel scientific opinion on the annual PMEM report on the cultivation of GM maize MON810, corresponding to the cultivation season 2015 (EFSA GMO Panel, 2017). During his presentation, Fernando Álvarez informed participants on the status of the cultivation of maize MON810 in the EU, gave an overview of the casespecific monitoring (CSM) and general surveillance activities (GS) performed by the consent holder, and summarised the conclusions and recommendations made by the GMO Panel in its scientific opinion.…”
Section: Efsa Gmo Panel Scientific Opinion On the 2015 Annual Pmem Rementioning
confidence: 99%