Annual report of the productivity and bibliometrics of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

Abstract

A journal article is a comprehensive account of a theoretical argument or proof of reproducible experimental results and statistical analyses conducted in accordance with the appropriate procedure and form. However, no matter how well written the article is, its value cannot be gauged without a reader (who peruses it), and other subsequent researchers who cite it (to maintain and protract its lifespan).Journal editors should solicit papers of excellent quality to improve the academic level, enhance national and international recognition, and maintain the reputation of their journals by increasing the frequency of citations. Moreover, they should endeavor to publish high-quality journals through thorough management of all processes related to thesis publication. It is important to establish a framework to facilitate the submission of excellent papers by frequently managing objective indicators to evaluate the quality of journals and notifying readers. We would like to periodically disseminate the production and citation indicators of this journal to achieve this goal. Productivity review of KJAKorean Journal of Anesthesiology (KJA) was founded in 1968 as an official journal of the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. It was published monthly until 2014 and bimonthly since 2015. KJA aims to publish high-quality clinical and scientific reports of all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, and pain medicine.In 2020, KJA received 690 articles (all types of submissions). Since 2018, the number of submissions has increased by 37% annually. KJA has published a total of 99 articles, which consisted of 8 editorials, 14 reviews, 4 statistical rounds, 26 clinical research articles, 4 experimental research articles, 13 case reports, 25 letters to the editor, and 5 articles belonging to other categories.KJA has adopted a rapid review system since 2014, which ensures that the editorial team provides their final decision within 7 days. In the previous year, 65% of all submissions were rapidly rejected by this system. Finally, the acceptance rate was 12.1%, and the rejection rate was 86.2%. The 4-year (2017-2020) average acceptance rate was 15.0% and the rejection rate was 83.5%. The average duration between the date of receiving the manuscript and the first decision was 13.4 days. This statistic is an indication of the duration required for key activities in the process. We are immensely proud of our rapid review system and relatively fast decision time, since it gives authors more choices. Bibliometric analysisBibliometric analyses were performed using the Bibliometrix (ver 3.0, an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis) package program [1]. For production analysis,

Authors who contributed most to the fields of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis since 2011 using the hT-index: Bibliometric analysis

“…In each cycle, they enter hydration metrics, including body weight, blood pressure, urine output, and ultrafiltration volume. The use of bibliometrics and visual analysis has been applied in a number of disciplines, [26] including anesthesiology, ophthalmology, stomatology, and obstetrics and gynecology, [27][28][29][30] yet no bibliometric articles have been published on the authors who have contributed the most to HD/PD. Although authors from the United States were present in 30.6% of 7618 PD papers in 887 journals (6991 articles and 627 reviews) [31] and the United States was the most productive country (n = 51) of the 100 most influential papers on peritoneal dialysis, [32] IRAs (taking both publications and citations into account) dominated by the United States should be verified further.…”

Comprehensive Bibliometric Overview of Research Trends of Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research

“…In this review, we have presented some of the related studies. Bibliometric studies of the institutions include CNIO, 3 IIT, 4 IISER, 5 CSIR; 6 subject domain include COVID-19, [7][8][9] Coronavirus, 10 Vaccine Hesitancy, 11 Yoga, 12 Aloe Vera, 13 Pharmacology, 14 Clinical Pharmacology, 15 Pharmacy Practice Research, 16 Pharmaceutical Research in India 17 and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 18 Bipolar Disorder, 19 Digoxin Toxicity, 20 Antibiotics in Sediments, 21 and Journal includes Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 22 Allergy Journals, 23 Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 24 Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 25 Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 26 Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 27 Current Science, 28 Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 29 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 30…”

A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Ferritinophagy from 2014 to 2021

“…At present, bibliometrics and visual analysis have been applied in many disciplines such as anesthesiology, ophthalmology, stomatology and obstetrics and gynecology [8][9][10][11], but there are no bibliometrics articles about ferritinophagy. Visualization of Similarities Viewer (VOSviewer1.6.17, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) is a web software tool for building and visualizing bibliometrics, launched by Ness Jan van Eck and Dr. Ludo Waltman of Erasmus University in the Netherlands in 2009.…”