2019
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual Research Review: Universal and targeted strategies for assigning interventions to achieve population impact

Abstract: This article proposes that universal and targeted preventive interventions should be compared and evaluated in terms of their benefit–cost ratio in achieving population‐wide impact on mental disorders and related outcomes. Universal approaches attempt to affect every individual in a population, whereas targeted approaches select candidates for intervention based on screening of demographic or behavioral characteristics. Unique assets and challenges of each approach in achieving population impact in a cost‐effi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this year’s JCPP Annual Research Review, Kenneth Dodge, a Professor of Public Policy, wrote disarmingly of the lack of interventions that achieve population impact for child psychopathology (Dodge, 2020). ‘A change is needed' he wrote.…”
Section: Can Pgs Be Applied To Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this year’s JCPP Annual Research Review, Kenneth Dodge, a Professor of Public Policy, wrote disarmingly of the lack of interventions that achieve population impact for child psychopathology (Dodge, 2020). ‘A change is needed' he wrote.…”
Section: Can Pgs Be Applied To Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses have reviewed the effects of different delivery formats. Interpretations of the value of reported effect sizes (ES) from this body of work need to consider a number of factors [10]. For example, the importance of an effect can depend on intervention costs, ease of delivery, scale-up penalties, school attendance and academic/social benefits, changes in health care utilisation, numbers of new cases averted and spill over effects to peers [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretations of the value of reported effect sizes (ES) from this body of work need to consider a number of factors [10]. For example, the importance of an effect can depend on intervention costs, ease of delivery, scale-up penalties, school attendance and academic/social benefits, changes in health care utilisation, numbers of new cases averted and spill over effects to peers [10]. Small ES from relatively inexpensive, scalable interventions (e.g., in schools where the infrastructure exists), that reach large sections of the population at a time of vulnerability to mental health disorder could have substantial practical importance, considering the high prevalence of anxiety, its psychosocial and economic impact, and that so few young people access support via other means [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…© 2020 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health doi:10.1111/jcpp.13196Commentary onDodge et al (2020) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%