“…The number of articles and journals represented in the reviews has grown over time. Each one of those 25 reviews provided a brief summary of the content of articles by topic, as well as a commentary on the nature of the literature published that year (Arbona, 2000;Bikos, Dykhouse, Boutin, Gowen, & Rodney, 2013;Chope, 2008;Cook, 1991;Creager, 2011;Dagley & Salter, 2004;Erford & Crockett, 2012;Flores et al, 2003;Guindon & Richmond, 2005;Harrington & Harrigan, 2006;Hartung, 2010;Jepsen, 1992;Luzzo & MacGregor, 2001;Niles, 1997;Patton & McIlveen, 2009;Salomone, 1993;Savickas, 1989;Spokane & Hawks, 1990;Stoltz-Loike, 1996;Subich, 1994;Swanson & Parcover, 1998;Tien, 2007;Walsh & Srsic, 1995;Whiston & Brecheisen, 2002;Young & Chen, 1999). In reviewing past CDQ annual reviews, we identified some noteworthy trends.…”