2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual sums of carbon dioxide exchange over a heterogeneous urban landscape through machine learning based gap-filling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the test set R 2 obtained by the ANN method was 0.827. The test set R 2 obtained by Menzer et al (2015) using the ANN method was 0.740, which was 8% lower than this study. The R 2 value obtained by the GP method was 0.844, which was 6% higher than that of Menzer et al (2015); R 2 obtained by the RBF method was 0.790, which was 39% higher than that of Järvi et al (2012) and 3% higher than that of Menzer et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the test set R 2 obtained by the ANN method was 0.827. The test set R 2 obtained by Menzer et al (2015) using the ANN method was 0.740, which was 8% lower than this study. The R 2 value obtained by the GP method was 0.844, which was 6% higher than that of Menzer et al (2015); R 2 obtained by the RBF method was 0.790, which was 39% higher than that of Järvi et al (2012) and 3% higher than that of Menzer et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The test set R 2 obtained by Menzer et al (2015) using the ANN method was 0.740, which was 8% lower than this study. The R 2 value obtained by the GP method was 0.844, which was 6% higher than that of Menzer et al (2015); R 2 obtained by the RBF method was 0.790, which was 39% higher than that of Järvi et al (2012) and 3% higher than that of Menzer et al (2015). The RMSE of the test set obtained by the five methods ranged from 2.04 to 2.50 mmol m −2 s −1 , which was smaller than that of Järvi et al (2012) and Menzer et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…As an outcome of the Hestia effort, a large multifaceted effort, the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX), emerged (Whetstone, 2018;Davis et al, 2017). INFLUX aims to advance quantification and associated uncertainties of urban CO 2 and CH 4 emissions by integrating a high-resolution bottom-up emission data product, such as Hestia, with atmospheric concentration measurements (Turnbull et al, 2015;Miles et al, 2017;Richardson et al, 2017), flux measurements (Cambaliza et al, , 2015Heimburger et al, 2017), and atmospheric inverse modeling. In addition to its use as a key constraint in the INFLUX atmospheric inverse estimation (Lauvaux et al, 2016), Hestia has been informed by atmospheric observations making it useable as a standalone high-resolution flux estimate offering a detailed spacetime understanding of urban emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a combination of atmospheric measurements, atmospheric transport modeling, and datadriven "bottom-up" estimation, the scientific community is exploring different methodologies, applications, and uncertainty estimation of these approaches (Hutyra et al, 2014). Atmospheric monitoring includes ground-based CO 2 concentration measurements (McKain et al, 2012;Djuricin et al, 2010;Miles et al, 2017;Turnbull et al, 2015;Verhulst et al, 2017), ground-based eddy flux (i.e., emissions of CO 2 into the atmosphere and/or CO 2 being removed from the atmospheric by vegetation) measurements (Christen, 2014;Grimmond et al, 2002;Menzer et al, 2015;Velasco and Roth, 2010;Velasco et al, 2005), aircraft-based flux measurements (Mays et al, 2009;Cambaliza et al, , 2015, and whole column abundances from both ground-and spacebased remote-sensing platforms (Wunch et al, 2009;Kort et al, 2012;Wong et al, 2015;Schwandner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural networks (ANNs) form a category of non-parametric models that have frequently been used to fill gaps in EC CO 2 flux time series. Mostly, multilayer perceptrons (MLP) were chosen (Papale and Valentini, 2003;Moffat et al, 2007;Moffat, 2012;Järvi et al, 2012;Pypker et al, 2013;Menzer et al, 2015) while other authors utilized radial basis function (RBF) networks (Schmidt et al, 2008;Kordowski and Kuttler, 2010;Menzer et al, 2015). For CH 4 fluxes, MLP models are described by Dengel et al (2013), Deshmukh et al (2014), Knox et al (2015) and Goodrich et al (2015) as well as a special kind of RBF network, a generalized regression neural network (GRNN), by Zhu et al (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%