2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annular-to-Leaflet Mismatch and the Need for Reductive Annuloplasty in Patients Undergoing Mitral Repair for Chronic Mitral Regurgitation Due to Mitral Valve Prolapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch on MitraClip® success remains unresolved. Immediate postprocedural findings by Maisano et al suggest that patients who do not have an annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch (defined as an SL/ALH <1.4) may benefit from a minimally invasive mitral leaflet apposition (e.g., via MitraClip®) only, whereas patients with an annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch (SL/ALH >1.4) may require an annuloplasty in addition to leaflet apposition. However, our findings suggest that patients with pure FMR or MMR, both of which are characterized by an annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch, benefit from isolated leaflet apposition (without concomitant annuloplasty).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch on MitraClip® success remains unresolved. Immediate postprocedural findings by Maisano et al suggest that patients who do not have an annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch (defined as an SL/ALH <1.4) may benefit from a minimally invasive mitral leaflet apposition (e.g., via MitraClip®) only, whereas patients with an annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch (SL/ALH >1.4) may require an annuloplasty in addition to leaflet apposition. However, our findings suggest that patients with pure FMR or MMR, both of which are characterized by an annular‐to‐leaflet mismatch, benefit from isolated leaflet apposition (without concomitant annuloplasty).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an ideal anatomic combination to obtain sufficient coaptation surface between the leaflets, we calculated the ratio between SL dimension and anterior and posterior leaflet height (ALH, anterior leaflet height; PLH, posterior leaflet height). Maisano et al 12 declared an SL/ALH ratio and SL/ALH þ PLH ratio of >1.4 and >0.7, respectively, as an annular-to-leaflet mismatch (requiring an annuloplasty ring in addition to leaflet repair). Based on these criteria, patients were The mid-esophageal 50-70°plane is used to measure the IC dimension; the long axis view at 140-160°view is used to measure the SL (also known as anteroposterior) dimension of the annulus in systole.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Leaflet-to-Annulus Index (LAI) <1.4, defined as the ratio between the sum of anterior leaflet length and posterior leaflet length over antero-posterior length, can be used as reliable predictor to identify patients without annular dilatation (32,33). The LAI identifies the quantity of overlapping leaflet tissue that will represent the potential coaptation surface after the correction (Figure 7).…”
Section: Role Of Concomitant Annuloplasty To Artificial Chordaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since patients are being referred for surgery earlier, the need for reductive annuloplasty in every patient becomes questionable [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%