1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.34.674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies in conservation laws in the Hamiltonian formalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We immediately notice that (25) are not square integrable functions in phase space, which implies that d ± are zero. This proves that H is self-adjoint and, as a consequence, that there are no anomalies as explained by Esteve [14].…”
Section: Now Let Us Study What Happens When We Implement Classical Mesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We immediately notice that (25) are not square integrable functions in phase space, which implies that d ± are zero. This proves that H is self-adjoint and, as a consequence, that there are no anomalies as explained by Esteve [14].…”
Section: Now Let Us Study What Happens When We Implement Classical Mesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…r. It is easy to prove that these transformations on p and r can be generated via the Poisson brackets by the dilation charge D of Eq. (14). This means that the scale symmetry can be implemented as a canonical transformation in the standard phase space of classical mechanics.…”
Section: Scale Symmetry In Classical Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evident by the appearance of the momentum dependence of phase shifts in the scattering sector and by the appearance of bound states in certain cases. The underlying reason behind this is that the domain of self-adjointness of the associated Hamiltonian is not kept invariant by the scaling operator [19,20,21,22]. Scale invariance at the quantum level is recovered only for special choices of the parameter z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For x → −∞, we must have Ψ(x) → 0. With that in mind we get the zero energy solution ("bound state") Ψ(x) = e mx 1 0 , (3.15) 16) which is localised near x = 0. Besides this normalisable solution, H has a set of generalised eigenfunctions.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%