2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2022.169159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies in physical cosmology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This appears to be the case at present. See discussions in the literature (e.g., Famaey & McGaugh 2012;Kroupa 2012;Bull et al 2016;Bullock & Boylan-Kolchin 2017;Di Valentino et al 2021;Abdalla et al 2022;Banik & Zhao 2022;Kroupa et al 2022;Peebles 2022;Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2022), although not all authors have similar views.…”
Section: Theoretical Implications Of the Gravitational Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This appears to be the case at present. See discussions in the literature (e.g., Famaey & McGaugh 2012;Kroupa 2012;Bull et al 2016;Bullock & Boylan-Kolchin 2017;Di Valentino et al 2021;Abdalla et al 2022;Banik & Zhao 2022;Kroupa et al 2022;Peebles 2022;Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2022), although not all authors have similar views.…”
Section: Theoretical Implications Of the Gravitational Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed deviation of the internal kinematics of galaxies and galaxy clusters from the Newtonian prediction is usually attributed to unidentified dark matter (DM). This has been the most popular interpretation of the astronomical data backed by the "right" amount of DM in the universe inferred from the standard cosmology based on general relativity (Peebles 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these challenges pointing to preferred directions on large cosmological scales include the quasar dipole [2][3][4][5][6], the radio galaxy dipole [7][8][9], the bulk velocity flow [10][11][12][13], the dark velocity flow [14], the CMB anomalies [15,16], the galaxy spin alignment [17][18][19], the galaxy cluster anisotropies [20], and a possible SnIa dipole [21,22]. These observational challenges of the CP may be indirectly connected with other tensions of the standard ΛCDM model including the Hubble [23][24][25] and growth ten- * leandros@uoi.gr sions [26][27][28][29] where the best fit parameter values of the model H 0 and σ 8 appear to be inconsistent when probed by different observational data. These tensions may indicate that a new degree of freedom [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] is required to be introduced in the ΛCDM model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, given the large scatter of the H I scaling relations found in previous studies, typically 0.2-0.3 dex in log 10 (M H I /M * ), one can expect that some galaxies will deviate significantly from the average relations. Studies of galaxies with H I anomalies should in principle provide insights into the physical processes that drive gas-related star formation and quenching, and probably also cosmological models (e.g., Peebles 2022). In this regard, there has been a rich history of studies on the H I content of early-type galaxies (ETGs; e.g., Knapp et al 1985;Wardle & Knapp 1986;Bregman et al 1992;Morganti et al 2006;di Serego Alighieri et al 2007;Grossi et al 2009;Serra et al 2012;Young et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%