2020
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery repair outcomes: Preoperative mitral regurgitation persists in the follow‐up

Abstract: Objective: This study aims to present the midterm outcomes of surgical correction of the anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) with a focus on mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Medical records of 36 ALCAPA patients who underwent surgery in a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Results: There were one (2.7%) neonate, 19 (52.7%) infants, 15 (41.6%) children, and 1 (2.7%) adult patient operated. Coronary reimplantation, tube reconstruction, and coronary artery bypass surgery… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown et al ( 3 ) argued that concurrent mitral valve intervention is unnecessary for patients with ALCAPA. However, Biçer et al ( 4 ) noted that despite the low rate of mitral valve reintervention, more than moderate preoperative MR required attention. Similarly, Weixler et al ( 5 ) believed that patients with more than moderate MR had a higher risk of reintervention after surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown et al ( 3 ) argued that concurrent mitral valve intervention is unnecessary for patients with ALCAPA. However, Biçer et al ( 4 ) noted that despite the low rate of mitral valve reintervention, more than moderate preoperative MR required attention. Similarly, Weixler et al ( 5 ) believed that patients with more than moderate MR had a higher risk of reintervention after surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alsoufi et al22 and more recently Weixler et al20 recommended concomitant MV repair in patients with severe MVI or in whom preoperative organic, rather than functional, MV pathology is diagnosed. In older children with important MVI, MV repair at the time of coronary reimplantation may be advisable because, unlike in infants, the cause of MVI could be irreversible myocardial or papillary damage, which is not expected to improve with recovery of left ventricular function 23. Lastly, Huddleston et al3 recommended cardiac catheterization in patients with recurrent or persistent MVI after ALCAPA repair, to evaluate the patency of the reimplanted coronary artery before MV repair.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%