1966
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous rectification in the metacerebral giant cells and its consequences for synaptic transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
69
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of electrical transmission depends not only on the conductance of the gap junction channels but also on the electrical and geometrical characteristics of the coupled cells (Bennett, 1966(Bennett, , 1977, which are determined to a large extent by their morphology and membrane properties. Thus, in addition to the control of gap junctional conductance itself (Furshpan and Potter, 1959;Auerbach and Bennett, 1969;Piccolino et al, 1982;Lasater and Dowling, 1985;Yang et al, 1990;Pereda et al, 1992Pereda et al, , 1998, changes in the conductance of the nonjunctional membrane are known to have a profound impact on electrical coupling (Kandel and Tauc, 1966;Spira et al, 1976;Zipser, 1979). In the mammalian CNS, neuronal gap junctions are often localized between small dendritic processes of dissimilar size and shape (Llinás et al, 1974;De Zeeuw et al, 1995;Fukuda and Kosaka, 2000;Fukuda and Kosaka, 2003) where geometry may favor transmission in one direction or the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of electrical transmission depends not only on the conductance of the gap junction channels but also on the electrical and geometrical characteristics of the coupled cells (Bennett, 1966(Bennett, , 1977, which are determined to a large extent by their morphology and membrane properties. Thus, in addition to the control of gap junctional conductance itself (Furshpan and Potter, 1959;Auerbach and Bennett, 1969;Piccolino et al, 1982;Lasater and Dowling, 1985;Yang et al, 1990;Pereda et al, 1992Pereda et al, , 1998, changes in the conductance of the nonjunctional membrane are known to have a profound impact on electrical coupling (Kandel and Tauc, 1966;Spira et al, 1976;Zipser, 1979). In the mammalian CNS, neuronal gap junctions are often localized between small dendritic processes of dissimilar size and shape (Llinás et al, 1974;De Zeeuw et al, 1995;Fukuda and Kosaka, 2000;Fukuda and Kosaka, 2003) where geometry may favor transmission in one direction or the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term anomalous rectification has been used to describe the increase and decrease in slope conductance that occur close to the resting potential in a number of vertebrate and invertebrate neurones as the membrane potential is either hyperpolarized or depolarized (metacerebral giant neurones of Helix aspersa: Kandel & Tauc, 1966;motoneurones: Nelson & Frank, 1967; hippocampal pyramidal cells in vivo: Purpura, Prelevic & Santini, 1968; hippocampal pyramidal cells in vitro: Hotson, Prince & Schwartzkroin, 1979). As noted by Nelson & Lux (1970) slopeconductance measurements provide little information on the nature or ionic mechanism of the rectifying process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they increase MCC excitability so that responses to afferent (i.e., C2 mediated) input are enhanced. Notably, the CC9 -10 induced depolarization may act in concert with the intrinsic anomalous rectification of the MCC (Kandel and Tauc, 1966;Weiss and Kupfermann, 1976) to further enhance the EPSPs that C2 evokes. C2 (Weiss et al, 1986b) is activated when food contacts the mouth and remains active as feeding progresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%