2009
DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2009.9711621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Uranium Isotope Ratio in Atmospheric Deposits in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly uranium depositions in 1964 at Fukuoka are extremely large compared with those in 2000, a cause for which is larger mass depositions in 1964. The amount of enriched uranium deposited in Fukuoka in these days is thus smaller than in the 1960s, while the 235 U/ 238 U ratios in the 1960s and in 2000s are comparable ( Figure 2) [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The monthly uranium depositions in 1964 at Fukuoka are extremely large compared with those in 2000, a cause for which is larger mass depositions in 1964. The amount of enriched uranium deposited in Fukuoka in these days is thus smaller than in the 1960s, while the 235 U/ 238 U ratios in the 1960s and in 2000s are comparable ( Figure 2) [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This finding is associated with the existence of enriched uranium-bearing hot particles originating from nuclear test explosions. In contrast, the 235 U/ 238 U ratio in the acid-insoluble part of the deposit in 2000 is higher than the natural ratio, suggesting the existence of enriched uranium fused with silicate minerals [4]. Based on the temporal variation of the specific activity of 234 Th in atmospheric deposits collected in Osaka, Japan, Matsunami and Mamuro [13] suggested that uranium from nuclear test explosions had been deposited in Japan in the 1970s within two months after the explosions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Releases of enriched uranium and other radionuclides into the atmosphere have been reviewed by Salbu and Lind (2011). Besides major single releases such as the Chernobyl reactor failure or the burnup of the Cosmos satellite reactors (Krey et al, 1979;Leifer et al, 1987), longer-term sources of uranium such as windblown dust from nuclear test sites have been postulated to increase the 235 U content of atmospheric uranium (Kikiwada et al, 2009). Apart from isolated events, most of the uranium in the remote atmosphere is not enriched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%