2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00241-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous γ→3π amplitude in a bound-state approach

Abstract: The form factor for the anomalous process γπ + → π + π 0 , which is presently being measured at CEBAF, is calculated in the Schwinger-Dyson approach in conjunction with an impulse approximation. The form factors obtained by us are compared with the ones predicted by the simple constituent quark loop model, vector meson dominance and chiral perturbation theory, as well as the scarce already available data.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15,25,26,39,40,41,42,55], since the incorporation of the quark-photon interactions is the same as adopted there through the scheme of a generalized impulse approximation, where all propagators, bound-state vertices, and quark-photon vertices are dressed. (In the present application, this impulse approximation is illustrated by the qq pseudoscalar-γγ triangle graph in Fig.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15,25,26,39,40,41,42,55], since the incorporation of the quark-photon interactions is the same as adopted there through the scheme of a generalized impulse approximation, where all propagators, bound-state vertices, and quark-photon vertices are dressed. (In the present application, this impulse approximation is illustrated by the qq pseudoscalar-γγ triangle graph in Fig.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ the Ball-Chiu vertex [60], which is widely used (e.g., see Refs. [20,21,22,25,39,40,41,42,55] and references therein).…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and of interactions in Refs. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. There is nevertheless a need to return to this theme; namely, a programme aimed at charting the interaction between lightquarks by explicating the impact of differing assumptions about the behaviour of the Bethe-Salpeter kernel on hadron elastic and transition form factors [48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the momentum dependence, i.e., the growth of the form factor F 3π γ (p 1 , p 2 , p 3 ) from its soft-point limit A 3π γ turned out to be so slow (after all six permutations of the graph in Fig. 1 were taken into account properly [29]), that the Serpukhov data point could not possibly be explained in that approach. (Also the related processes η, η ′ → 2πγ could hardly be reconciled with such a weak momentum dependence [29] of the γ * → 3π form factor.)…”
Section: A Insight From the Dyson-schwinger Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%