2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.0536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly classification in digital mammography based on multiple‐instance learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The usage of neural networks is an option that has been widely explored, but the results obtained from this author's work are lower than the one achieved by the proposed methodology. Elmoufidi et al (2017) proposed a feature vector which contains a combination of several families of texture and shape features. Five algorithms are implemented in their study: The first MIL solutions were mi-SVM and MI-SVM, which generalize the popular supervised SVM, diverse density, axis-parallel rectangles (APR), and MILBoost, which generalizes the popular ensemble classifiers in that context.…”
Section: Comparison With State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The usage of neural networks is an option that has been widely explored, but the results obtained from this author's work are lower than the one achieved by the proposed methodology. Elmoufidi et al (2017) proposed a feature vector which contains a combination of several families of texture and shape features. Five algorithms are implemented in their study: The first MIL solutions were mi-SVM and MI-SVM, which generalize the popular supervised SVM, diverse density, axis-parallel rectangles (APR), and MILBoost, which generalizes the popular ensemble classifiers in that context.…”
Section: Comparison With State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of the 261 mammograms from the MIAS database, an Az value of 0.85 was obtained for the diagnosis of malignant tumors. Elmoufidi et al (2017) proposed to partition the mammogram into regions and from the detected ROIs. For each region, texture features and shape features were derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], a new technique for partitioning the breast adaptively into regions was proposed, and multiple‐instance learning (MIL) algorithm was employed to recognise abnormal regions, achieving an accuracy of 94.6%. The MIL algorithm was also employed in the CAD system of [9] to classify ROIs extracted by the K ‐means algorithm as benign or malignant. A CAD system consisting of homomorphic filtering, local seed region growing, and spherical wavelet transform [10] was developed to detect and classify benign and malignant breast masses with a maximum accuracy of 96%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], ROI regions are located and extracted on the basis of the maximally inscribed circle and centroid methods. In addition, an algorithm automatically generates a class number that can partition mammogram into the best areas as ROI rigions can be found in [14]. Similarly, an algorithm that uses tetrolet filter to reduce the speckle noise and the active contour method based on statistical features to automatically segment breast lesions to obtain an ROI can be found in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%