ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9053558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly Detection for Time Series Using VAE-LSTM Hybrid Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section covers the extensive experiments conducted to test and compare the performance of DQR-AD with six other state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods that model prediction error using Gaussian distribution to identify anomalies. These methods include DeepAnT [33], NumentaTM [52], ContextOSE [58], EXPoSE [59], AE [38], and VAE-LSTM [39]. The experiment is conducted using real and synthetic datasets from different application domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section covers the extensive experiments conducted to test and compare the performance of DQR-AD with six other state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods that model prediction error using Gaussian distribution to identify anomalies. These methods include DeepAnT [33], NumentaTM [52], ContextOSE [58], EXPoSE [59], AE [38], and VAE-LSTM [39]. The experiment is conducted using real and synthetic datasets from different application domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for each timeseries point, an anomaly score is calculated which helps in handling the type of anomaly detection problem. Deep learning-based anomaly detection techniques using long short-term memory (LSTM) [28][29][30] and other forms of recurrent neural network (RNN) [31,32], convolutional neural network (CNN) [33], and autoencoder [15,[34][35][36][37][38][39] demonstrate higher performance over the previously mentioned prediction-base anomaly detection techniques. Despite their performance and unsupervised learning approach, they compute the anomaly score by assuming a distribution usually of Gaussian type on the prediction error, which is either ranked, or threshold to label data instances as anomalous or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that OOD detection is often conflated with novelty, anomaly, or outlier detection in the literature [ 34 ]. However, predictions in the case of novelty or outlier detection in time series data often implies identifying deviation from an expected input based on a chosen error metric [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows unsupervised diagnostics to be performed in cases where there are no labeled data for training. Lin et al [ 27 ] used a variational autoencoders (VAE) module for forming robust local features over short windows and an LSTM module for estimating the long-term correlations in the series on top of the features inferred from the VAE module. P.T.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%