2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1802.06360
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly Detection using One-Class Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
172
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this issue, recent work [5], [7], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] focuses on coupling the representation learning objective with anomaly detection. For example, deep distance-based methods [5], [23] integrate the representation learning with distance-based anomaly detectors, while deep one-class classifiers, such as deep support vector data description (SVDD) [7], [22], [27] and deep one-class SVM [25], [26], aim to learn representations for the one-class classification model. These approaches achieve large improvement over the previous methods.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, recent work [5], [7], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] focuses on coupling the representation learning objective with anomaly detection. For example, deep distance-based methods [5], [23] integrate the representation learning with distance-based anomaly detectors, while deep one-class classifiers, such as deep support vector data description (SVDD) [7], [22], [27] and deep one-class SVM [25], [26], aim to learn representations for the one-class classification model. These approaches achieve large improvement over the previous methods.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OOD detection has been a long history. Most existing works are in supervised representations (Liang, Li, and Srikant 2017;Chalapathy, Menon, and Chawla 2018;Lee et al 2018;Hendrycks and Gimpel 2016;Hendrycks, Mazeika, and Dietterich 2019). These algorithms train a model that produces a score indicating how likely the input sample is an inlier.…”
Section: Out-of-distribution Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the original test image and the reconstruction indicates anomalies in the image. There are different methods to learn the normality of data such as autoencoders and their variants ( [5], [15], [16], [17]), one-class SVMs ( [18], [19]), and generative adversarial network ( [20], [21]). These methods cannot incorporate the context for learning the normality.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare CADNet with several approaches, including a standard autoencoder [16], one-class SVM [18], and GAN [20], to learn normality. For the sake of compatibility, we implement these baselines with the same architecture of the encoder-decoder parts of CADNet.…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%