2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3683542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomaly of film porosity dependence on deposition rate

Abstract: This Letter reports an anomaly of film porosity dependence on deposition rate during physical vapor deposition -the porosity increases as deposition rate decreases. Using glancing angle deposition of Cu on SiO 2 substrate, the authors show that the Cu film consists of well separated nanorods when the deposition rate is 1 nm/second, and that the Cu films consists of a more uniform (or lower porosity) film when the deposition rate is 6 nm/second; all other deposition conditions remain the same. This anomaly is t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This bundling association has since been reported in a large variety of OAD thin films prepared by either evaporation or MS [143][144][145][223][224][225][226], and though development of this microstructural arrangement has been mainly reported for metal thin films [10,11,54,56,144,145,223,224], it has also been utilized as a template structure with oxides to develop new composite thin films (see for example [225] and [226]). Surprisingly, aside from some detailed discussions in early reviews [10], this bundling phenomenon has not attracted much attention in recent investigations on OAD thin films.…”
Section: Correlation Distance and Bundling Associationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This bundling association has since been reported in a large variety of OAD thin films prepared by either evaporation or MS [143][144][145][223][224][225][226], and though development of this microstructural arrangement has been mainly reported for metal thin films [10,11,54,56,144,145,223,224], it has also been utilized as a template structure with oxides to develop new composite thin films (see for example [225] and [226]). Surprisingly, aside from some detailed discussions in early reviews [10], this bundling phenomenon has not attracted much attention in recent investigations on OAD thin films.…”
Section: Correlation Distance and Bundling Associationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, the porosity of a Cu OAD thin film is qualitatively related to its deposition rate and the wetting ability of copper on a silicon substrate, in such a way that the initially formed nuclei control the posterior evolution of the thin film's microstructure and therefore also the final porosity of the film [143]. Modeling the OAD thin film microstructure and growth by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and other numerical methods has been carried out to better understand the evolution of porosity as a function of the deposition angle [93,228], with Suzuki et al [62] deducing that evaporated OAD thin films should present a maximum surface area at an evaporation angle of 70°.…”
Section: Porosity and Adsorption Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, the two first BMs present a strong polarization activity when interrogated with linearly polarized light, while the two latter are practically insensitive to the polarization state. Thanks to a thorough analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a field ion beam (FIB) set-up we have been able to show that association of nanocolumns, a rather general phenomenon in OAD films known with the term bundling, 30,31 is the critical morphological feature responsible for the singular macroscopic behavior of the slanted and zig-zag BMs. Bundling association of nanocolumns is believed to extend along the whole thickness of single oxide OAD thin films, [30][31][32][33] a feature that we have confirmed here by FIB-SEM analysis of the BMs.…”
Section: Morphology and Fence-bundling Association Of Nanocolumnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most materials, it is necessary to drop the lateral dimension to ∼ 10 nm before size effects begin to become dominant and deliver a qualitative change in properties [1] . Among objects on this length scale, small metallic nanorods, those that are ∼ 10 nm in diameter in comparison to larger metallic nanorods that are ∼ 100 nm in diameters, have emerged as technologically important, and their fabrication has been widely reported in the literature [2][3][4][5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%