2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
75
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The communities we observed were very civil, as shown by the low amount of trolling present in story reviews. This civility was surprising because readers can leave anonymous reviews on Fanfiction.net, and anonymous forms of online communication have a reputation for being susceptible to trolling [46]. This civility could in part be a legacy of the benign atmosphere found in early fanfiction zines' Letters of Comment; it may be that other affinity spaces that lack this legacy may not be supportive enough to sustain distributed mentoring [34].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communities we observed were very civil, as shown by the low amount of trolling present in story reviews. This civility was surprising because readers can leave anonymous reviews on Fanfiction.net, and anonymous forms of online communication have a reputation for being susceptible to trolling [46]. This civility could in part be a legacy of the benign atmosphere found in early fanfiction zines' Letters of Comment; it may be that other affinity spaces that lack this legacy may not be supportive enough to sustain distributed mentoring [34].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a review of existing research, Tokunaga (2010) reports victimization rates of 4%-53%, with bully percentages of 3%-23%. anonimity offered by IT (Moore, Nakano, Enomoto, & Suda, 2012). School staff members are therefore likely to be less aware of this type of bullying than they are of traditional bullying, and they are thus less capable of responding immediately (Snakenborg, Van Acker, & Gable, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include which activities and venues comprise electronic bullying (Vandebosch and Van Cleemput 2009), whether defining attributes of bullying such as intent to harm, power imbalance and repetition should also be applicable to electronic bullying (Patchin and Hinduja 2015), and how electronic bullying should be addressed by schools and school-based bullying interventions (Bauman and Bellmore 2015). Similar constructs to electronic bullying that have been studied among adolescents include online harassment (e.g., Jones et al 2015, online aggression (e.g., Law et al 2010, aggressive forum posts (e.g., Moore et al 2012), and negative online peer feedback (e.g., Koutamanis et al 2015).…”
Section: Involvement With Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%